It is hard to go an entire day without scrolling through social media, checking in on family members and friends, and double-tapping on their posts. 

That may explain why attitudes toward social media giants like Facebook and Twitter are mixed among Americans ahead of the 2020 election. 

A new Cheddar poll found more than 40 percent of Americans believe that Facebook (45 percent) and Twitter (44 percent) are treating political content the same when it comes to flagging and deleting certain posts, regardless of ideology. But one in five still think the platforms unfairly target conservative content — that number jumps to nearly 40 percent among Republicans. 

More than half of Democrats and nearly half of Independents believe these companies treat political speech the same. 

This reveals some of the clearest fractures among different voter groups when it comes to attitudes toward social media platforms and the content that they host. 

About a third of Americans believe that Facebook and Twitter should remove posts believed to be false but around half of Americans (Facebook: 55 percent, Twitter 47 percent) believe those posts should stay up — though more than half of those people say the content should include a disclaimer. 

This poll collected responses after social media platforms removed a controversial article published by the New York Post regarding a laptop with compromising information that purportedly belonged to Hunter Biden, leading to outrage among conservative groups who likened it to a violation of the First Amendment. It led to allegations that social media companies remove speech they dislike rather than removing speech that violates their terms of service. Now lawmakers are pushing for testimony from those companies’ CEOs about the censorship of conservative content and calling for more regulation of the platforms. 

Section 230 has become a buzzword on Capitol Hill around social media regulation. The obscure part of the Communications Decency Act gives social media companies wide liability protection over content posted on their sites. 

But regardless of how often lawmakers rail against Section 230 protections, it does not seem to have the same impact when it comes to American sentiment. Slightly more Americans believe the government should regulate technology platforms versus allowing them to regulate themselves, 40 percent to 37 percent respectively. 

This comes as those lawmakers argue about the legal loopholes that allow social media giants to profit off of content on their platforms but are not held accountable for that content. Many conservative legislators in particular are concerned about the regulation of conservative speech, despite conservative content routinely making up the top posts on Facebook each week. 

This also tracks with the trend among self-described conservatives who largely believe that conservative-leaning content is more censored than any other content. 

It’s a message that has been reinforced by the White House, where President Donald Trump has held official presidential events to combat perceived social media bias, filling the Rose Garden with popular right-leaning online personalities and launching a tool in 2019 encouraging people to report incidents of social media bias. That portal is now closed, but that messaging may explain why the president holds a slight lead on the topic of which candidate is best equipped to handle powerful social media companies. Overall, 42 percent of people said Trump will best respond to a world where social media companies hold a lot of power, compared to 38 percent for former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee. 

Americans under 35 and older than 65 see Biden as slightly better to manage social media power than Trump, while people in the middle age ranges give the edge to Trump. Men rank Trump as better to handle social media giants, while women say it would be Biden. 

It’s clear, though, that no matter who is elected president on Election Day, social media companies will face a great deal of scrutiny in the future. This week, the Department of Justice filed antitrust charges against technology giant Google and many lawmakers have suggested the same must be done for Facebook and other social media platforms. 

Social media CEOs will continue to be questioned by lawmakers on their influence on the American electorate, but if it’s difficult to chart a legislative path forward, it may be due to divisions among the American people when it comes to attitudes toward social media and the regulation of these companies. 

This poll of 2,000 adults was conducted between October 16 and October 19 exclusively for Cheddar by SurveyUSA.

Share:
More In Politics
U.S. To Send $800 Million In Military Aid To Ukraine
President Biden has announced an additional $800 million in military assistance to Ukraine, including artillery, armored personnel carriers, and helicopters. It comes as Russian forces appear to be preparing for a new, aggressive offensive in the eastern part of Ukraine. Paul McLeary, defense reporter for Politico, joined Cheddar to discuss this new round of aid and what it means for the U.S. commitment to arming the embattled country.
Growing Activism Responds to School Book Bans
Activism is growing around the country in response to school boards banning books from shelves that focus on sexuality, gender, identity, or race. Jen Cousins, co-founder of The Florida Freedom to Read Project, joins Cheddar News to discuss.
President Biden Announces U.S. Ban on Russian Oil Imports
As the Russian invasion of Ukraine intensifies, President Biden has announced a ban on importing Russian oil, gas, and energy. To discuss how this ban will impact the war and Americans, Amir Handjani, non-resident fellow at Quincy Institute, joins Cheddar News.
Protesters Around the World Stand with Ukraine
Thousands of protesters around the world are expressing their solidarity with Ukraine against Russia's invasion. Jason Beardsley, national executive director of the Association of the U.S. Navy and national security expert, joins Cheddar News to discuss.
Oil Price Crisis Could Lead to Speedier Push Toward Clean Energy Transition
As gas prices surge amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine, other nations could potentially transition faster to using clean energy than previously expected. Philip K. Verleger, a senior fellow at the Niskanen Center, joined Cheddar News to explain how this could be a possibility in the near future. "Part of the reason I think we have this invasion and the tantrum that's being thrown by Russia, terrible tantrum, is because the Russians were trying to slow down the transition," he said. "Ironically they speeded it up."
Impact on Consumers as More Companies Leave Russian Market
Following the invasion of Ukraine, a multitude of Western companies have paused doing business with Russia. PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, and Starbucks are the most recent companies to temporarily cease operations in Russia. Dean of Miami Herbert Business School at the University of Miami, John Quelch, joined Cheddar News to discuss what message this sends to Russia and the Russian consumer. “I would not underestimate the collective strength of all of these multinational companies, essentially coming together to make their collective statement in support of the political statements that have come out of Washington," he said.
Russia-Ukraine Crisis Putting Crypto In The Spotlight
The war in Ukraine continues to reveal heartbreaking gut-wrenching stories. The war in itself is not only devastating but also expensive. Experts estimate that Russia is draining nearly $20 million dollars each day to continue occupying and invading Ukraine. All this could force the country to turn to cryptocurrencies. It's a major turn for the country that briefly considered outlined digital assets entirely, but it could also have serious implications for cryptos. Managing Director at Quantum Fintech Group, Harry Yeh, joined Cheddar to discuss more.
Load More