In a hearing full of interruptions, objections about processes, and varied interpretations of the same facts, Democratic lawmakers presented the impeachment case against the president and the Republicans defended his conduct.

After statements from the top lawmakers on the House Judiciary committee, the committee's lawyers gave their opening statements. The lawyers for both parties on the Intelligence Committee where the initial public hearings were held last month, had the opportunity to present findings from their respective investigations.

Today's hearing will set the scene for how Democrats will presumably phrase articles of impeachment for a vote which could come before Christmas. Much of the language used Monday by Democratic lawyer Daniel Goldman in summarizing the House Intelligence Committee's findings may be echoed in the formal articles. Goldman used his opening statement to summarize the case against the president, defended the speed of his investigation, and laid out four "critical findings."

The Democrats' case is centered on the allegation that President Trump tried to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into the president's political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, and an unsubstantiated claim that Ukraine conspired with Democrats to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Goldman, the Intel committee's top investigative counsel, noted key findings that the president abused the power of his office to pressure a foreign nation to interfere in U.S. elections, withheld aid and a White House meeting with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to do so, undermined U.S. national security, and engaged in an "unprecedented effort" to obstruct the Congressional inquiry.

Republicans argue the president did nothing wrong in his conduct with Ukraine, and after a break, will present their own Intelligence report. The White House has refused to participate in the hearing and in the larger impeachment inquiry, but the President has been tweeting about the "Do Nothing Democrats" throughout the morning.

However, Goldman clearly argued, "We are here today because Donald J. Trump, the 45th president of the United States, abused the power of his office, the American presidency, for his political and personal benefit."

PRESIDENT PRESENTS "CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER," DEMOCRATS ARGUE

"The evidence is overwhelming," the Judiciary Committee's Democratic counsel Barry Berke testified Monday morning.

After Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrod Nadler began the hearing by saying President Trump "put himself before country," setting the stage for articles of impeachment, Berke said the facts were "uncontradicted" and "cannot be disputed." (Although White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham tweeted different set of "indisputable facts" about the president's conduct Monday morning.)

During his opening statement, Berke told committee members the president's actions were "so brazen, so clear," that the president had clearly abused his power to advance his own interests over those of his nation.

The president "did what a president of our nation is not allowed to do," Berke said. Trump's actions, he argued "threaten our rule of law, they threaten our institutions, and, as James Madison warned us, they threaten our republic."

"This is a big deal" Berke said during his statement, in which he played key moments from previous witness testimony, including the hearing in which Russia expert and diplomat Dr. Fiona Hill described Ambassador Gordon Sondland as working on a "domestic political errand."

"None of these excuses hold any water" Burke said of the Republicans case, as he placed today's hearing in the context of special counsel Robert Mueller III's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Berke said the president had obstructed the Russia investigation and made a case for the urgency of moving quickly on impeachment. "Our imagination is the only limit on what President Trump may do next." Burke said.

On the Intel side, responding to criticism from Republican lawmakers and lawyers, Goldman defended his case, noting "this investigation moved swiftly and intensively — as all good investigations should."

He also said, "to the extent that other witnesses would be able to provide more context and detail about this scheme, their failure to testify is due solely to the fact that President Trump obstructed the inquiry and refused to make them available."

"President Trump's persistent and continuing effort to coerce a foreign country to help him cheat to win an election is a clear and present danger to our free and fair elections and to our national security," Goldman said.

The attorney argued that the president continues to try to meddle in the 2020 presidential election, including his comments to reporters that his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani would make a report to the Justice Department about Democrats.

REPUBLICANS DEFEND THE PRESIDENT

"Democrats are obsessed with impeaching the president," Republican counsel Steve Castor said in his opening statement, in which he began by expressing complaints about process.

Castor, who is serving as Republican counsel for both the Intel and Judiciary Committees, devoted much of his opening statement to criticizing how the Democrats have conducted the investigation.

"There is simply no clear evidence that President Trump acted with malicious intent in withholding a meeting or security assistance. Indeed there are — and the Republican report articulates them — legitimate explanations for these actions that are not nefarious as the Democrats allege," he said.

Castor said the president did not pursue his own personal interests, but rather was trying to help Ukraine.

Castor, who focused on the actions of the Democrats said "to impeach a president, who 63 million people voted for, over eight lines in a call transcript is baloney." During Castor's second statement, in which he presented findings from the Republican Intelligence investigation, he repeated that Zelensky said he felt no pressure from Trump.

He also said the Democratic case is full of "hearsay, presumptions, and speculations," highlighting the Republican strategy in the impeachment hearing: trying to raise doubts about the evidence presented.

Meanwhile, at the same time Republicans and Democrats battled it out on Capitol Hill Monday, the presidents of Ukraine and Russia met for the first time in Paris to hold peace talks.

Share:
More In Politics
Is VP Harris Getting Sidelined?
Vice President Kamala Harris received impressive amount of media coverage in January for making history. However, the media attention waned significantly and some are now even saying she has almost disappeared from public view. Reecie Colbert, founder of BlackWomenViews Media, joined Cheddar Politics to discuss more.
Buzzfeed Scores Win in Mueller Report FOIA Fight
If you thought you heard the last of the Mueller report back in 2019, you'd be wrong. While the bombshell report was the biggest story in Washington for years, much of the report remained redacted. Our friends at BuzzFeed News weren't satisfied, so they sued to have certain passages unredacted. They notched another win when a federal appeals court ordered ten passages from the report to be released. Matt Topic, BuzzFeed's attorney in the case, and Jason Leopold, reporter at BuzzFeed News, join Cheddar Politics to discuss.
Omicron Spotlights Lack of Global Pandemic Preparedness
The U.S. reported its first confirmed case of the omicron variant in California on Wednesday. Scientists and health officials are racing to understand the variant, with the WHO saying it's still too early to determine whether it's more contagious, more deadly or more resistant to vaccines than other variants. Omicron has pushed members of the WHO to commit to start talks over a "gobal pandemic treaty" for future pandemic preparedness. Priti Krishtel, co-founder and co-executive director of the Initiative for Medicines, Access & Knowledge, joins Cheddar Politics to discuss.
Roe v. Wade at Stake After Supreme Court Mississippi Abortion Hearing
Wednesday was not a good day for those who believe in abortion rights in this country as the Supreme Court heard arguments on a Mississippi abortion law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The majority of the court appears poised to roll back abortion rights, and the questions from the conservative justices seemed to indicate the law for nearly 50 years is likely to change. Jessica Mason Pieklo, senior vice president and executive editor of Rewire News Group, joined Cheddar Politics to discuss Wednesday's hearing.
Michael Cohen to Sell His Federal Prison Badge as NFT
Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former personal lawyer, has been busy since completing his prison sentence in November. He's getting into the NFT space, selling his federal prison badge and the original manuscript of his book "Disloyal" as NFTs. Cohen joined Cheddar to discuss his latest venture and why he thinks there is still much to be revealed about his case.
Biden Boom, Jussie Guilty & Love, Hate, Ate
Carlo and Baker wrap up the week talking about the Biden economic boom that no one seems to notice, a verdict in the Jussie Smollett case, the first Starbucks union in America and the pleasures of the "dude nod."
New Cannabis Expungement Bill Introduced In Congress
A new bill in Congress shows just how bipartisan cannabis really is. Rep. David Joyce, a Republican from Ohio, teamed up with progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on a cannabis expungement bill. Cheddar cannabis reporter Chloe Aiello spoke with the congressman about the legislation.
Progressives in Congress Back Bill to Institute Four-Day Workweek
The Congressional Progressive Caucus have lined up to support the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act introduced by Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif. 41st District). The representative joined Cheddar to discuss how instituting a four-day workweek in the United States can be beneficial for both employees with the need of a work-life balance and employers looking both to retain talent amid a labor shortage and improve efficiency in their workforces. "We live in a different time than 90 years ago when we established a 40-hour workweek," he said. "We've had a lot of technological changes, the American worker is exponentially more productive than previous generations, so it's time to reexamine Americans and the way in which they relate to work."
Load More