In a hearing full of interruptions, objections about processes, and varied interpretations of the same facts, Democratic lawmakers presented the impeachment case against the president and the Republicans defended his conduct.

After statements from the top lawmakers on the House Judiciary committee, the committee's lawyers gave their opening statements. The lawyers for both parties on the Intelligence Committee where the initial public hearings were held last month, had the opportunity to present findings from their respective investigations.

Today's hearing will set the scene for how Democrats will presumably phrase articles of impeachment for a vote which could come before Christmas. Much of the language used Monday by Democratic lawyer Daniel Goldman in summarizing the House Intelligence Committee's findings may be echoed in the formal articles. Goldman used his opening statement to summarize the case against the president, defended the speed of his investigation, and laid out four "critical findings."

The Democrats' case is centered on the allegation that President Trump tried to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into the president's political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, and an unsubstantiated claim that Ukraine conspired with Democrats to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Goldman, the Intel committee's top investigative counsel, noted key findings that the president abused the power of his office to pressure a foreign nation to interfere in U.S. elections, withheld aid and a White House meeting with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to do so, undermined U.S. national security, and engaged in an "unprecedented effort" to obstruct the Congressional inquiry.

Republicans argue the president did nothing wrong in his conduct with Ukraine, and after a break, will present their own Intelligence report. The White House has refused to participate in the hearing and in the larger impeachment inquiry, but the President has been tweeting about the "Do Nothing Democrats" throughout the morning.

However, Goldman clearly argued, "We are here today because Donald J. Trump, the 45th president of the United States, abused the power of his office, the American presidency, for his political and personal benefit."

PRESIDENT PRESENTS "CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER," DEMOCRATS ARGUE

"The evidence is overwhelming," the Judiciary Committee's Democratic counsel Barry Berke testified Monday morning.

After Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrod Nadler began the hearing by saying President Trump "put himself before country," setting the stage for articles of impeachment, Berke said the facts were "uncontradicted" and "cannot be disputed." (Although White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham tweeted different set of "indisputable facts" about the president's conduct Monday morning.)

During his opening statement, Berke told committee members the president's actions were "so brazen, so clear," that the president had clearly abused his power to advance his own interests over those of his nation.

The president "did what a president of our nation is not allowed to do," Berke said. Trump's actions, he argued "threaten our rule of law, they threaten our institutions, and, as James Madison warned us, they threaten our republic."

"This is a big deal" Berke said during his statement, in which he played key moments from previous witness testimony, including the hearing in which Russia expert and diplomat Dr. Fiona Hill described Ambassador Gordon Sondland as working on a "domestic political errand."

"None of these excuses hold any water" Burke said of the Republicans case, as he placed today's hearing in the context of special counsel Robert Mueller III's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Berke said the president had obstructed the Russia investigation and made a case for the urgency of moving quickly on impeachment. "Our imagination is the only limit on what President Trump may do next." Burke said.

On the Intel side, responding to criticism from Republican lawmakers and lawyers, Goldman defended his case, noting "this investigation moved swiftly and intensively — as all good investigations should."

He also said, "to the extent that other witnesses would be able to provide more context and detail about this scheme, their failure to testify is due solely to the fact that President Trump obstructed the inquiry and refused to make them available."

"President Trump's persistent and continuing effort to coerce a foreign country to help him cheat to win an election is a clear and present danger to our free and fair elections and to our national security," Goldman said.

The attorney argued that the president continues to try to meddle in the 2020 presidential election, including his comments to reporters that his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani would make a report to the Justice Department about Democrats.

REPUBLICANS DEFEND THE PRESIDENT

"Democrats are obsessed with impeaching the president," Republican counsel Steve Castor said in his opening statement, in which he began by expressing complaints about process.

Castor, who is serving as Republican counsel for both the Intel and Judiciary Committees, devoted much of his opening statement to criticizing how the Democrats have conducted the investigation.

"There is simply no clear evidence that President Trump acted with malicious intent in withholding a meeting or security assistance. Indeed there are — and the Republican report articulates them — legitimate explanations for these actions that are not nefarious as the Democrats allege," he said.

Castor said the president did not pursue his own personal interests, but rather was trying to help Ukraine.

Castor, who focused on the actions of the Democrats said "to impeach a president, who 63 million people voted for, over eight lines in a call transcript is baloney." During Castor's second statement, in which he presented findings from the Republican Intelligence investigation, he repeated that Zelensky said he felt no pressure from Trump.

He also said the Democratic case is full of "hearsay, presumptions, and speculations," highlighting the Republican strategy in the impeachment hearing: trying to raise doubts about the evidence presented.

Meanwhile, at the same time Republicans and Democrats battled it out on Capitol Hill Monday, the presidents of Ukraine and Russia met for the first time in Paris to hold peace talks.

Share:
More In Politics
U.S. To Send $800 Million In Military Aid To Ukraine
President Biden has announced an additional $800 million in military assistance to Ukraine, including artillery, armored personnel carriers, and helicopters. It comes as Russian forces appear to be preparing for a new, aggressive offensive in the eastern part of Ukraine. Paul McLeary, defense reporter for Politico, joined Cheddar to discuss this new round of aid and what it means for the U.S. commitment to arming the embattled country.
Growing Activism Responds to School Book Bans
Activism is growing around the country in response to school boards banning books from shelves that focus on sexuality, gender, identity, or race. Jen Cousins, co-founder of The Florida Freedom to Read Project, joins Cheddar News to discuss.
President Biden Announces U.S. Ban on Russian Oil Imports
As the Russian invasion of Ukraine intensifies, President Biden has announced a ban on importing Russian oil, gas, and energy. To discuss how this ban will impact the war and Americans, Amir Handjani, non-resident fellow at Quincy Institute, joins Cheddar News.
Protesters Around the World Stand with Ukraine
Thousands of protesters around the world are expressing their solidarity with Ukraine against Russia's invasion. Jason Beardsley, national executive director of the Association of the U.S. Navy and national security expert, joins Cheddar News to discuss.
Oil Price Crisis Could Lead to Speedier Push Toward Clean Energy Transition
As gas prices surge amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine, other nations could potentially transition faster to using clean energy than previously expected. Philip K. Verleger, a senior fellow at the Niskanen Center, joined Cheddar News to explain how this could be a possibility in the near future. "Part of the reason I think we have this invasion and the tantrum that's being thrown by Russia, terrible tantrum, is because the Russians were trying to slow down the transition," he said. "Ironically they speeded it up."
Impact on Consumers as More Companies Leave Russian Market
Following the invasion of Ukraine, a multitude of Western companies have paused doing business with Russia. PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, McDonald's, and Starbucks are the most recent companies to temporarily cease operations in Russia. Dean of Miami Herbert Business School at the University of Miami, John Quelch, joined Cheddar News to discuss what message this sends to Russia and the Russian consumer. “I would not underestimate the collective strength of all of these multinational companies, essentially coming together to make their collective statement in support of the political statements that have come out of Washington," he said.
Russia-Ukraine Crisis Putting Crypto In The Spotlight
The war in Ukraine continues to reveal heartbreaking gut-wrenching stories. The war in itself is not only devastating but also expensive. Experts estimate that Russia is draining nearly $20 million dollars each day to continue occupying and invading Ukraine. All this could force the country to turn to cryptocurrencies. It's a major turn for the country that briefly considered outlined digital assets entirely, but it could also have serious implications for cryptos. Managing Director at Quantum Fintech Group, Harry Yeh, joined Cheddar to discuss more.
Load More