*By Carlo Versano* America's deep partisan divisions and simmering anger exploded into view Thursday in a Senate hearing room that combined the forces of the #MeToo movement with left-right antagonism and the stakes of a lifetime Supreme Court seat. For four hours, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford riveted the country [11 days](https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.52707f4a3889) after she was thrust into the spotlight when she publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Following her testimony, Judge Brett Kavanaugh stridently rejected those allegations ー as well as others that have been made public ー in point-by-point denials punctuated with flashes of anger, interruption and indignance toward Senate Democrats. On the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, traders [stopped](https://twitter.com/thebradsmith/status/1045338088728408066) to hear Ford's testimony. On airplanes, [passengers](https://twitter.com/CNNnewsroom/status/104534692897899725) were glued to the in-flight television broadcasts. In waiting rooms, [patients](https://twitter.com/mekosoff/status/1045324371315892225) watched and cried. [Commuters] (https://twitter.com/aronczyk/status/1045372845537267712) listened via smartphones on the New York City subway. For a country in the throes of a reckoning on sexual misconduct ー galvanized in its views of a chaotic presidency and frustrated by a Congress that perpetually seems paralyzed by partisan bitterness ー the scene on Capitol Hill seemed to shift almost immediately from a hearing about a political appointment (a televised job interview, in essence) to a shared national moment. Ford's testimony relied almost entirely on her memory of a high-school gathering some 35 years ago, when the person she identified as Brett Kavanaugh, drunk and egged on by a friend, allegedly held her down on a bed and assaulted her. Ford was not able to offer corroborating witnesses during Thursday's testimony. Yet when asked by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) if she was certain that Kavanaugh was the boy who attacked her, Ford did not equivocate: "One hundred percent," she said. Ford, a psychologist and teacher by trade, acted as both witness and expert. She calmly offered the Senate Judiciary Committee a doctor's reasoning as to why she remembered certain aspects of the event (who was present during the alleged assault, for example) and not others (how she got there). When asked about what she recalled most, Ford said: "Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter, the uproarious laughter, between the two, and them having fun at my expense." Republican senators on the committee ceded their allotted time for questions to a seasoned Arizona sex crimes prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, who questioned aspects of Ford's memory and a polygraph test she took last month. Meanwhile, the Democrats on the committee, some of whom are considering presidential runs, took a mostly hands-off approach in questioning Ford and instead offered praise and words of comfort for her decision to come forward and testify in public. During breaks, GOP senators largely deflected questions from reporters about her credibility, and instead directed their ire at the the other side of the aisle, criticizing how Democrats handled the accusations when Dr. Ford first contacted her local Congresswoman. "If this is the new norm, you better watch out for your nominees," an angry Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told reporters in a reference to Democrats. Other Republicans seemed unwavering in their support of Kavanaugh. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) said Ford's testimony was "what I expected." After Dr. Ford wrapped up her testimony, it was Kavanaugh's turn. The federal judge delivered a 45-minute opening statement ー far different and far longer than the one that was given to the media ー with a raised voice and furrowed brow in which he forcefully denied that he had ever committed sexual assault. President Trump reportedly told aides he wanted to see a more combative and defiant Brett Kavanaugh ー and that is exactly what he got. Kavanaugh did not accuse Dr. Ford of lying, instead directed his fury at the Democrats sitting in front of him, saying they were "lying in wait" to torpedo his nomination and that the allegations amounted to a "grotesque and coordinated character assassination." I fear that the whole country will reap the whirlwind," he said. Kavanaugh turned emotional when he said that his family had received threats, and that his reputation had been sullied: "My family and my name have been totally and permanently destroyed." His emotion was tempered by anger in his back and forth volleys with members of the committee. At one point, Kavanaugh responded to a question by Sen. Amy Klobuchar asking whether he had ever blacked out from drinking by asking her if she had. (He later apologized). Kavanaugh was repeatedly asked by Democrats if he would support an FBI investigation into the alleged assault, but he never gave a "yes" or "no" answer. Sen. Graham, voice raised, excoriated Democrats for dragging Kavanaugh's name through the mud. "This is not a job interview," he said. "This is hell." Meanwhile, while a transfixed nation watched the drama play out, the only audience that really mattered ー a handful of moderate senators like Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), and Jeff Flake (R-AZ) who will have to vote against Kavanaugh to spike the nomination ー were silent as of Thursday evening.

Share:
More In Politics
End of Child Tax Credit Could Mean Slide Back Into Increasing Child Poverty
Millions of Americans with young children have relied on the child tax credit since the federal government began issuing checks in July 2021. The last round of payments was sent out just before the Christmas holiday — at the same time as the omicron variant surged. Leah Hamilton, associate professor of social work at Appalachian State University, joined Cheddar to discuss what the end to the tax credit means as the U.S. sees the end of many relief programs and its highest number of COVID cases since the start of the pandemic. "It'll become harder for families to meet their basic needs, increasing national childhood poverty rates and the proportion of families who have difficulty putting food on the table, maintaining stable housing, and paying their bills," Hamilton said. She also pointed to research that the credit as a long-term investment in children offsets claims that it contributes to macroeconomic impacts like inflation.
President Biden Speaks with Ukrainian President Ahead of Russia Meeting
U.S. President Joe Biden spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky over the week-end, just days after he spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The call comes as Washington prepares to meet with Moscow on January 10, as tensions mount over Russia's military build up near its border with Ukraine. Cheddar News speaks with Mustafa Tameez, a former advisor to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, about the issue.
NYT Piece Claims Silicon Valley Investors and Founders Contorted Legal Tax Break to Avoid Taxes on Investment Profits
Several Silicon Valley insiders are being accused of contorting a 1990s-era tax break to avoid taxes on millions of dollars of investment profits. The tax break is known as the qualified small business stock exemption, and it allows early investors in certain companies to avoid half of the taxes on up to $10 million in capital gains. A piece recently published in the New York Times says venture capital firms like Andreessen Horowitz replicated the tax exemption by giving shares of companies to friends and family, who would otherwise face a 23.8% capital gains bill. The CEO of Roblox is also accused of replicating the tax break for his family members at least 12 times. Although the loophole known as 'stacking' is considered to be legal, the Times piece implies that the exemption has been manipulated for the ultra-wealthy to become more wealthy. Greycroft co-founder and Chairman Emeritus Alan Patricof joins Cheddar News' Closing Bell to discuss.
This Year In Trivia
Hena Doba and Azia Celestino recap some of the biggest stories of the year, and learn a thing or two while they're at it. It's This Year in Trivia!
Looking Ahead to Regulating Uber, Lyft, and the Gig Economy in 2022
The push to regulate the gig worker economy is gaining steam as the share of workers who participate in freelancing through businesses like Uber and Lyft have also exponentially grown during the pandemic. Employment attorney Mark Kluger, founding partner at Kluger Healey, LLC, joined Cheddar to break down how the battle to reclassify gig workers will continue in the new year, and why the issue continues to generate conflict. "More and more workers are using gig work as their primary source of income and as a result of that they are not like employees in the sense that they don't have benefits like health insurance," Kluger noted.
2022 Promises a Mixed Bag of Market Predictions
2021 saw markets continue to be impacted by the onslaught of the coronavirus pandemic -most recently in the form of the Omicron variant- in addition to the global supply chain shortage, and increased inflation. But it wasn't all bad news, as crypto soared throughout the year, and meme stocks continued to have a moment. With the year coming to a close, investors are keeping an eye out to see if they should expect more of the same in the new year. Chris Vecchio, Senior Analyst, at DailyFX tells us what market trends to be on the watch for in 2022.
Load More