When the Justice Department last month received an explosive allegation by a whistleblower who claimed President Trump had asked his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate Joe Biden, federal investigators apparently closed the case within weeks without conducting any interviews, relying instead almost entirely on a non-verbatim summary of the conversation.

That decision has sparked sharp questions from lawmakers, legal experts, and former federal prosecutors, who insist that the Justice Department's handling of the investigation marked a pronounced departure from basic investigative practices, especially for an allegation of such magnitude.

"This whole thing is mind-boggling," says Nick Akerman, a former Watergate special prosecutor. "You can't just look at the 'transcript' to see if there's a crime here. If the transcript is unreliable to begin with, you've got to be bringing people in to see if it's accurate and context. They just reviewed this stupid transcript – that's insane."

The development has once again thrust an embattled Justice Department and its top official, Attorney General William Barr, back into the spotlight, just months after Barr came under intense scrutiny for his handling of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler, (D-N.Y.), has called on Barr to recuse himself from the matter.

According to the call memo released by the White House, Trump referenced Barr five times by name or title. The Justice Department, in a statement, said that Barr was only "notified of the President's conversation with Ukrainian President Zelensky several weeks after the call took place," and that Trump has neither asked the attorney general to contact Ukraine nor spoken with him "about having Ukraine investigate anything relating to former Vice President Biden or his son."

However, former federal prosecutors say that interviewing the attorney general should have been a key part of the department's inquiry into whether to further pursue the allegations.

"If you're someone at the Justice Department making a decision whether there's a crime here, Barr is a potential witness," says Dennis Burke, a former prosecutor and senior official at the Justice Department.. "He's referenced in it, and you don't know until you interview people – did he know about this? Was this all pre-planned? There's only one way to find out: 'We're going to go interview the AG.'"

"I don't know how you don't interview him; if this file is dropped on my desk, I can't close this case or make a determination until I interview Barr."

Intelligence officials in August informed the Justice Department that the inspector general for the Intelligence Community had received a complaint from an anonymous whistleblower, who alleged that Trump in July "sought to pressure" Zelensky "to take actions to help the President's 2020 election bid," according to a letter from the inspector general that was made public Thursday.

The whistleblower's complaint, also released Thursday, suggested the president's request to investigate the Bidens may have been tied to his decision to withhold security aid to Ukraine and a prestigious invitation for Zelensky to visit the White House.

The summary of the July 25 call showed the president asking his Ukrainian counterpart to open an investigation into Democratic candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who previously served on the board of a major Ukrainian gas company. Trump added that Barr and the president's personal attorney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, would be in touch.

Reaction to these reports have been split, largely down party lines. The revelations led House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to announce the opening of an impeachment inquiry. However, Republicans have largely argued that there is no evidence from the call record of quid pro quo.

U.S. election laws prohibit candidates from asking for money or other things of value from foreigners. The intelligence community's inspector general also raised other concerns: Not only is seeking "foreign assistance to interfere in or influence a federal election" a "serious or flagrant problem [or] abuse," Inspector General Michael Atkinson wrote, but it "would also potentially expose such a U.S. public official" or others "to serious national security and counterintelligence risks."

For this reason, Atkinson continued, the whistleblower's allegation met the definition of an "urgent concern" that "appears credible."

The Justice Department, though, disagreed with the conclusion. In a statement this week, Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said that investigators in the department's Criminal Division, "relying on established procedures set forth in the Justice Manual the Department's Criminal Division reviewed the official record of the call and determined, based on the facts and applicable law, that there was no campaign finance violation and that no further action was warranted."

Questions about how the Justice Department reached that conclusion, and Barr's potential role in overseeing the related inquiry, are sure to persist.

"He was in charge of this investigation that they closed out. You have to wonder what that was all about," Akerman says. As the Democratic-led House interviews witnesses as part of its inquiry into a potential impeachment of the president, lawmakers "should start with William Barr."

Share:
More In Politics
Democrats' Election Day Woes
Going into election day on Tuesday, many of us had an inkling it might not be a great day for Democrats. History tells us the president's party tends to lose congressional seats, governorships and state legislature seats in off-year and midterm elections. Tuesday turned out to be a big wake-up call for democrats. Not only did Terry McAuliffe lose in the Virginia governor's race, Gov. Phil Murphy won re-election by an incredibly slim margin. Both races saw continued Democratic losses in rural areas and a shift of suburban voters back to the GOP. Liz Landers, chief political correspondent at Vice News, joins Cheddar Politics to discuss.
World Leaders Pledge Climate Actions at COP26
Week one of UN climate summit is coming to an end, world leaders made a number of promises to save the planet. President Biden attended the first two days of the meeting. Alan Neuhauser, vice president of Silverline Communications, joined Cheddar Politics to talk more about the pledges that came out from the summit and their significance.
Supreme Court Hears Cases on Abortion and Gun Rights
It's been a busy week for the Supreme Court. It heard arguments on three of the most watched cases in the docket for this term. The court heard arguments in two cases challenging the Texas abortion law on Monday - one filed by abortion providers and the other by the justice department. Instead of weighing in on the constitutionality of the matter itself, justices focused on the unusual structure of the law that enables citizens to enforce the law, not the state government. On Wednesday, the court heard arguments in the biggest Second Amendment case in more than a decade. The dispute is over a New York gun law that requires people seeking a license to carry a handgun in public to show a "proper cause." The challengers in this case claim the law inhibits their constitutional Second Amendment rights. Amy Howe, co-founder of SCOTUSBlog, joined Cheddar Politics to break the cases down.
Cheddar Changemakers: Conservation Conservatives
This is the first installment of Cheddar Changemakers, where we spotlight young activists making a difference in the world and speaking up on issues regarding mental health, voting, and climate change. Republicans are considered, and often act like, the party opposed to action on climate change. They've made a point of fighting even modest regulations on businesses related to stemming the worst effects of climate change. But Republicans aren't a monolith on climate change, and our next guest reminds us that "conservation" and "conservative" have the same word root. Quill Robinson, VP of government affairs at the American Conservation Coalition, joins Cheddar Politics to discuss.
Portland Mayor Wheeler on Increasing City's Police Budget, Revamping Public Safety
The mayor of Portland, Oregon, Ted Wheeler joined Cheddar News Wrap to discuss his plans to get an increase in the city's police budget for more personnel, changes to public safety response, and more body cameras. The Democratic mayor addressed the growth in violent crimes amid the pandemic, but noted the need for officers who take their roles seriously. We want officers who understand that policing is an important responsibility, it's a high calling," he said. "We also want a police bureau that is accountable and responsible to the public it serves."
Why Tech Firms Like Yahoo, Fortnite Continue to Exit China
More American tech companies continue to pull their businesses out of China as the Communist Party cracks down on firms — both foreign and domestic. Yahoo and Fortnite have become the latest companies to withdraw from the country, and the withdrawals come just days after Microsoft announced it would take LinkedIn offline. Shehzad Qazi, managing director at China Beige Book International, joined Cheddar to provide some insight into how the crackdowns in China would also impact the tech companies at home in the United States.
'The Good Liars' Release New Mockumentary 'The Supporters'
'The Good Liars' are Jason Selvig and Davram Stiefler, a comedy duo that's been shaking up the political world for years. They're out with a new mockumentary, 'The Supporters,' following the 2020 election. Jason Selvig & Davram Stiefler, Stunt Comedians and creators of 'The Good Liars' joined Cheddar News to discuss.
Load More