When the Justice Department last month received an explosive allegation by a whistleblower who claimed President Trump had asked his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate Joe Biden, federal investigators apparently closed the case within weeks without conducting any interviews, relying instead almost entirely on a non-verbatim summary of the conversation.

That decision has sparked sharp questions from lawmakers, legal experts, and former federal prosecutors, who insist that the Justice Department's handling of the investigation marked a pronounced departure from basic investigative practices, especially for an allegation of such magnitude.

"This whole thing is mind-boggling," says Nick Akerman, a former Watergate special prosecutor. "You can't just look at the 'transcript' to see if there's a crime here. If the transcript is unreliable to begin with, you've got to be bringing people in to see if it's accurate and context. They just reviewed this stupid transcript – that's insane."

The development has once again thrust an embattled Justice Department and its top official, Attorney General William Barr, back into the spotlight, just months after Barr came under intense scrutiny for his handling of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler, (D-N.Y.), has called on Barr to recuse himself from the matter.

According to the call memo released by the White House, Trump referenced Barr five times by name or title. The Justice Department, in a statement, said that Barr was only "notified of the President's conversation with Ukrainian President Zelensky several weeks after the call took place," and that Trump has neither asked the attorney general to contact Ukraine nor spoken with him "about having Ukraine investigate anything relating to former Vice President Biden or his son."

However, former federal prosecutors say that interviewing the attorney general should have been a key part of the department's inquiry into whether to further pursue the allegations.

"If you're someone at the Justice Department making a decision whether there's a crime here, Barr is a potential witness," says Dennis Burke, a former prosecutor and senior official at the Justice Department.. "He's referenced in it, and you don't know until you interview people – did he know about this? Was this all pre-planned? There's only one way to find out: 'We're going to go interview the AG.'"

"I don't know how you don't interview him; if this file is dropped on my desk, I can't close this case or make a determination until I interview Barr."

Intelligence officials in August informed the Justice Department that the inspector general for the Intelligence Community had received a complaint from an anonymous whistleblower, who alleged that Trump in July "sought to pressure" Zelensky "to take actions to help the President's 2020 election bid," according to a letter from the inspector general that was made public Thursday.

The whistleblower's complaint, also released Thursday, suggested the president's request to investigate the Bidens may have been tied to his decision to withhold security aid to Ukraine and a prestigious invitation for Zelensky to visit the White House.

The summary of the July 25 call showed the president asking his Ukrainian counterpart to open an investigation into Democratic candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who previously served on the board of a major Ukrainian gas company. Trump added that Barr and the president's personal attorney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, would be in touch.

Reaction to these reports have been split, largely down party lines. The revelations led House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to announce the opening of an impeachment inquiry. However, Republicans have largely argued that there is no evidence from the call record of quid pro quo.

U.S. election laws prohibit candidates from asking for money or other things of value from foreigners. The intelligence community's inspector general also raised other concerns: Not only is seeking "foreign assistance to interfere in or influence a federal election" a "serious or flagrant problem [or] abuse," Inspector General Michael Atkinson wrote, but it "would also potentially expose such a U.S. public official" or others "to serious national security and counterintelligence risks."

For this reason, Atkinson continued, the whistleblower's allegation met the definition of an "urgent concern" that "appears credible."

The Justice Department, though, disagreed with the conclusion. In a statement this week, Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said that investigators in the department's Criminal Division, "relying on established procedures set forth in the Justice Manual the Department's Criminal Division reviewed the official record of the call and determined, based on the facts and applicable law, that there was no campaign finance violation and that no further action was warranted."

Questions about how the Justice Department reached that conclusion, and Barr's potential role in overseeing the related inquiry, are sure to persist.

"He was in charge of this investigation that they closed out. You have to wonder what that was all about," Akerman says. As the Democratic-led House interviews witnesses as part of its inquiry into a potential impeachment of the president, lawmakers "should start with William Barr."

Share:
More In Politics
States Turn to Unusual Solutions as Schools Face Staffing Shortages
With an increasing number of teachers and staff calling out sick by the day, the state of Oklahoma is turning to an unusual solution. Republican Governor Kevin Stitt has issued an executive order that permits state employees to work as substitute teachers. Shaily Baranwal, founder and CEO of Elevate K-12, joins Cheddar News to discuss.
Possible Cracks Between U.S. and Allies on Issue of Ukraine and Russia
On Thursday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken addressed the stance of the U.S. and its allies should Russia make any forays into Ukraine, a seeming response to President Biden's remarks that should Putin engage in something short of a full invasion, there might be some indecision among allied nations regarding what to do. Ariel Cohen, a senior fellow at the think tank Atlantic Council, joined Cheddar to discuss the difficulty faced by Blinken wrangling unity as tensions run high in the region. "There'll be a smaller incursion, and the president implied, there'll be a weaker response because our European allies have created this horrible situation where they are dependent on Moscow for their gas supply," Cohen explained.
Biden Approval Rating Tanking at One-Year Mark Over Issues Like Inflation
During a nearly two-hour press conference on Wednesday, President Biden spoke on his accomplishments and challenges from the first year of his presidency, and what his administration hopes to accomplish in the coming year. However, his approval ratings are underwater as COVID remains a big concern for voters — as does inflation, noted Tom Bevan, co-founder and president of polling aggregator RealClearPolitics. "The public thinks [inflation] is priority number one, and the administration is concerned about it, they talk about it, but they're not spending enough time on it as far as the public is concerned," said Bevan.
Behind Australian Judges Ruling for Allowing Novak Djokovic Deportation
The drama surrounding tennis star Novak Djokovic continues after he was deported from Australia over the weekend due to the nation's COVID-19 vaccine requirements. Djokovic was forced to leave the country on the eve of what was to be his first match in defense of his Australian Open title after three judges ruled in favor of his removal and revealed their reasoning for doing so. Adding to his woes, a law recently passed in France is putting his chances of defending his French Open title in jeopardy. The director of Marist's Center for Sports Communication, Jane McManus, joined Cheddar to discuss the ongoing fallout.
Louisiana Senate Candidate on Smoking Weed in His Campaign Ad
As the midterm elections get ever closer, candidates have been getting creative with their campaigns to stick out and to connect with voters. Gary Chambers, a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate from Louisiana, has definitely attracted attention with an advertisement featuring him smoking a blunt, making a point about the inequity of anti-cannabis laws. "We wanted to bring the seriousness of the moment," he said of the ad. "But we also wanted to make sure that people understand that there are 19 states that are legal right now but Black people and brown people are being over-incarcerated in mostly Southern and Midwestern states in America for cannabis possession."
TLDR Act Provides the 'TLDR' on Sites' Terms of Service
If some members of Congress have their way, there might finally be a 'TLDR' on sites' terms of service, introduced by the terms-of-service labeling, design, and readability act – or TLDR for short. With this act, users will actually understand what they're agreeing to or the many ways in which their data is being used before pressing 'accept.' J.D. sat down with co-sponsor of the bill and Senator Bill Cassidy, to discuss.
All Eyes on Biden: Amid Inflation, Pandemic, How Can President Push Agenda While His Party Controls Washington?
President Joe Biden's first year in office is wrapping up. What has he achieved, and what else remains on the table while the Democrats have control of Washington? Amid an ongoing pandemic and rising inflation, Biden's approval rating is at an all-time low and his party is plagued by infighting. Will he be able to continue pushing key parts of his agenda? Paul Glastris, former Bill Clinton speechwriter & Editor-in-chief of 'Washington Monthly,' joins Cheddar News' Closing Bell to discuss the president's achievements in his first year, where he's fallen short, and what he must do in order to get more of his agenda signed into law.
Senate Bills to Reign in Big Tech Anticompetitive Practices Could Hurt Consumers
Tech giants Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, and Apple are faced with a bipartisan antitrust legislation effort underway in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The companies stand accused of promoting their own goods and services over smaller competitors on their platforms, holding too much monopolistic power via their app stores and services. Adam Kovacevich, founder and CEO of Chamber of Progress, a technology industry trade group, joined Cheddar to argue that the bills that are being debated currently could end up hurting consumers, rather than helping.
Load More