*By Carlo Versano* The 90,000 or so retirees holding pensions with Sears are expected to have their benefits honored by the government-backed Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., or PBGC. But it will place an "enormous strain" on the guarantor that was designed be the main lifeboat for American pensioners, according to Eddie Stone, counsel to ProtectSeniors.org, which represents millions of retirees. Sears ($SHLD) is "on the hook" for its pension funds, which are underfunded by about $1.5 billion, as long as it stays in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, Stone said. But if it moves to the more extreme Chapter 7 ー in which it would sell off assets to repay debt rather than renegotiate the terms of its loans ー the benefits would be taken over by the PBGC. But the agency has limited resources, mainly due to the relatively flat returns from fixed-income investments due to what had been historically low interest rates. And without Sears paying its premiums, the guarantor is now worse off than it was just the day before Sears filed. Having to pay out Sears's long-term obligations will add to the PBGC's worries, Stone said. "This is going to tax the PBGC's ability to take on more defaulted pension plans." The issue is not new, and it highlights what Stone called a "systemic" global pension crisis. Sears was among the dwindling number of American businesses that still offered pension plans. Former CEO Eddie Lampert, the hedge fund executive who ran the company through its decline, put some of the blame from the company's bankruptcy on its pension obligations, of which it paid out $2 billion in the last five years. That's "missing the boat altogether," said Stone. He pointed out employees took lower paychecks in return for contributions to their pensions. "The retirees are entitled to their earned benefits," he said. "They aren't handouts." For full interview [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/bankruptcy-filing-shifts-spotlight-to-sears-pension-plans).

Share:
More In Business
Starbucks’ Change Flushes Out a Debate Over Public Restroom Access
Starbucks’ decision to restrict its restrooms to paying customers has flushed out a wider problem: a patchwork of restroom use policies that varies by state and city. Starbucks announced last week a new code of conduct that says people need to make a purchase if they want to hang out or use the restroom. The coffee chain's policy change for bathroom privileges has left Americans confused and divided over who gets to go and when. The American Restroom Association, a public toilet advocacy group, was among the critics. Rules about restroom access in restaurants vary by state, city and county. The National Retail Federation says private businesses have a right to limit restroom use.
Load More