Lawmakers grilled TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew on Thursday in a high-stakes hearing on the future of the popular, Chinese-owned video sharing platform in the U.S. 

“While TikTok videos provide a new, fun way for people to express their creativity and enjoy the videos of others, the platform also threatens the health, privacy, and security of the American people,” said Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J. 6th District)  during the hearing. 

With Congress weighing a bill to fully ban TikTok, Chew made the case that the company is committed to addressing lawmakers' concerns about privacy, user safety, and data security. 

“Trust is about actions we take. We will firewall protect the U.S. data from unwanted foreign access," Chew said. "TikTok will remain a place for free expression and will not be manipulated by any government." 

He also stressed that protecting younger users from harmful content would be a top priority and that TikTok would allow third-party monitors to scrutinize its operations. 

In addition, Chew touted an effort called Project Texas, which aims to move all data collected from U.S. citizens to within the country. 

These appeals mostly fell on deaf ears, with representatives from both sides of the aisle insisting that TikTok is working closely with the Chinese government. 

"I still believe that the Beijing communist government will still control and have the ability to influence what you do," said Pallone in reference to Project Texas. 

Chew responded to these accusations by repeatedly noting that TikTok is an  independent company. “TikTok is not available in mainland China, and today we’re currently headquartered in Los Angeles and Singapore," he said. 

Overall, the hearing was short on partisan bickering, as neither Democrats or Republicans had much positive to say about the platform. 

“Welcome to the most bipartisan committee in Congress,” Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga. 1st District). 

Updated with the latest information from the hearing.

Share:
More In Business
Starbucks’ Change Flushes Out a Debate Over Public Restroom Access
Starbucks’ decision to restrict its restrooms to paying customers has flushed out a wider problem: a patchwork of restroom use policies that varies by state and city. Starbucks announced last week a new code of conduct that says people need to make a purchase if they want to hang out or use the restroom. The coffee chain's policy change for bathroom privileges has left Americans confused and divided over who gets to go and when. The American Restroom Association, a public toilet advocacy group, was among the critics. Rules about restroom access in restaurants vary by state, city and county. The National Retail Federation says private businesses have a right to limit restroom use.
Load More