In 1997, “Star Wars” was the 5th highest grossing movie of the year. Before you start um actually-ing me that “Star Wars” came out in 1977 and was the highest grossing movie of its year, I’m talking about the re-release.

George Lucas remastered and put his world-changing classic back on the big screen in January of ‘97 and audiences rushed to it like they didn’t already have a well-loved copy of it on VHS at home. It, along with the rereleases of “Empire Strikes Back” and “Return of the Jedi” the same year, grossed over $250 million at the box office. Even with the few millions put into the revamps, rereleasing the sci-fi trilogy on its 20th anniversary was pure profit for Lucasfilm and 20th Century Fox.

With rereleases being pure profit, why aren’t studios always doing them? Well, they used to. Home video is a relatively new invention, only becoming popularized about 40 years ago. Before then, studios constantly put their older films back in theaters and left their new hits in cinemas for years.

Disney was the best at keeping their films in cinema rotation, making sure one of their animated classics was playing in theaters each summer. Their rereleases were actually so successful they were initially hesitant about putting their movies on VHS.

As home video became a major money maker, the practice of putting classics back in theaters went out of fashion. But with streaming now reigning supreme, home video doesn’t bring in the big bucks it used to. Which brings us to today where studios are making the smart move of rereleasing their classics once again.

For its 50th anniversary “Jaws” swam back onto the big screen this summer making $14 million. That’s no “Star Wars” in ‘97, but since Jaws had no marketing or production costs, that’s a nice tidy profit. Watching a movie at home doesn’t compare to seeing it in a theater, so I’m excited for “Back to the Future” returning to the big screen this weekend and I’m glad this pure profit enterprise is making its grand return.

Share:
More In Business
Spain fines Airbnb $75 million for unlicensed tourist rentals
Spain's government has fined Airbnb 64 million euros or $75 million for advertising unlicensed tourist rentals. The consumer rights ministry announced the fine on Monday. The ministry stated that many listings lacked proper license numbers or included incorrect information. The move is part of Spain's ongoing efforts to regulate short-term rental companies amid a housing affordability crisis especially in popular urban areas. The ministry ordered Airbnb in May to remove around 65,000 listings for similar violations. The government's consumer rights minister emphasized the impact on families struggling with housing. Airbnb said it plans to challenge the fine in court.
Roomba maker iRobot files for bankruptcy protection; will be taken private under restructuring
Roomba maker iRobot has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, but says that it doesn’t expect any disruptions to devices as the more than 30-year-old company is taken private under a restructuring process. iRobot said that it is being acquired by Picea through a court-supervised process. Picea is the company's primary contract manufacturer. The Bedford, Massachusetts-based anticipates completing the prepackaged chapter 11 process by February.
Serbia organized crime prosecutors charge minister, others in connection with Kushner-linked project
Serbia’s prosecutor for organized crime has charged a government minister and three others with abuse of position and falsifying of documents related to a luxury real estate project linked to U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. The charges came on Monday. The investigation centers on a controversy over a a bombed-out military complex in central Belgrade that was a protected cultural heritage zone but that is facing redevelopment as a luxury compound by a company linked to Kushner. The $500 million proposal to build a high-rise hotel, offices and shops at the site has met fierce opposition from experts at home and abroad. Selakovic and others allegedly illegally lifted the protection status for the site by falsifying documentation.
Load More