*By Hope King* Tiger Woods. Papa John's John Schnatter. Roseanne Barr. Just a few high-profile names that cost mega brands big. To protect themselves against celebrity scandal risk, companies have been taking out "disgrace insurance policies" against their celebrity endorsers at an increasing clip. In the U.S., the number of these policies has risen as much as 2,000 percent in the last few years, Janet Comenos, CEO of Spotted, a company that monitors celebrities and pairs them with brands, said in an exclusive interview with Cheddar. "The reason it's become so immensely popular in the U.S. over the last 18 months is because of the Harvey Weinstein scandal, and the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements," Comenos said. Another factor? The dominance of social media. "We're living in such a social media-driven environment that everything a celebrity does is immediately there for public consumption," she said. But it's not just celebrities that companies want to protect themselves against ー insurance companies that work with Spotted are also creating policies for top executives. The "more conservative industries" have been the early adopters, according to Comenos. Sectors such as financial services, pharmaceuticals, consumer packaged goods industries are ones she calls "first movers." And there's good reason for the policies. According to a 2016 study by the Harvard Business School, CEOs behaving badly between 2000 and 2015 resulted in a 3.1% decline in a company's stock price on average. Most recently, shares of [Wynn](https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wynn-resorts-shares-tank-after-report-of-sexual-misconduct-by-owner-steve-wynn-2018-01-26) and [Papa John's](https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2018/07/23/papa-johns-stock-dropped-nearly-10-percent/821719002/) suffered huge investor blowback when the companies' founders made headlines, respectively, for sexual assault allegations and racist comments. Disgrace insurance covers how much the brand paid for the endorsement (not any advertising around the celebrity), and costs around 1 percent of that amount. For example, a policy to recoup a $5 million endorsement would cost $50,000. When measuring which celebrities are most at risk for scandal, Spotted looks at 20 different risk factors, including stance on politics, race, and instances of infidelity. According to the company, the top five scandals that can damage a celebrity's professional career and appeal are, in order, sexual assault and harassment, physical attacks, drugs, infidelity, and offensive or lewd comments. "All of these things can alienate consumers and create risk for a brand," Comenos said. Spotted's latest report on the riskiest celebrities will be published later this month. For more on this story, [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/why-celebrity-disgrace-insurance-has-risen-2000).

Share:
More In Business
Poll: More Americans think companies benefit from legal immigration
A new poll finds U.S. adults are more likely than they were a year ago to think immigrants in the country legally benefit the economy. That comes as President Donald Trump's administration imposes new restrictions targeting legal pathways into the country. The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research survey finds Americans are more likely than they were in March 2024 to say it’s a “major benefit” that people who come to the U.S. legally contribute to the economy and help American companies get the expertise of skilled workers. At the same time, perceptions of illegal immigration haven’t shifted meaningfully. Americans still see fewer benefits from people who come to the U.S. illegally.
Tylenol maker rebounds a day after unfounded claims about its safety
Shares of Tylenol maker Kenvue are bouncing back sharply before the opening bell a day after President Donald Trump promoted unproven and in some cases discredited ties between Tylenol, vaccines and autism. Trump told pregnant women not to use the painkiller around a dozen times during the White House news conference Monday. The drugmaker tumbled 7.5%. Shares have regained most of those losses early Tuesday in premarket trading.
Load More