*By Chloe Aiello* Voters in San Francisco gave overwhelming support on Tuesday to a measure that would tax big tech for the sake of the homeless. And not everyone in the Silicon Valley stronghold is happy. Proposition C, or the “Our City, Our Home” initiative, was easily the most controversial issue on the city's ballot. It proposed a tax on revenue over $50 million ー which would hit about the top 1 percent of corporations ー to help mitigate San Francisco's homeless problem. More than 7,000 people in San Francisco experience homelessness ー a stark contrast to the wealth the tech industry has generated for its own. San Francisco has a "median home price \[of\] $1.6 million, the third most billionaires of any city in the world and one of the most dismaying homeless problems that a U.N. Special Rapporteur last year compared to Bangladesh," Scott Wilson, senior national correspondent at the Washington Post, who has covered the story, told Cheddar on Wednesday. "I think there's a real disconnect between what the public wants to see and what the political class is willing to do especially in trying to avoid irritating tech leaders," he added. The proposition's 10-point list includes efforts to provide more mental health and addiction treatment centers, place sanitation centers and mobile bathrooms on the streets, and expand homeless shelters, among other things. Salesforce ($CRM) CEO Marc Benioff has been one of the initiative's most vocal cheerleaders ー although his company will surely be hit by the proposed tax. "Prop C’s victory means the homeless will have a home & the help they truly need! Let the city come together in Love for those who need it most! There is no finish line when it come to helping the homeless. Thank you amazing supporters of Prop C," Benioff [gushed on Twitter](https://twitter.com/Benioff/status/1060060365193539584), following Prop C's victory. He even reportedly poured about $7 million of his own and his company's money into the campaign, billing homelessness as the responsibility of technology companies that have brought jobs and wealth to the city, while also widening wage gaps and driving up property values. But not all bigwigs in big tech seem to agree. Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter ($TWTR) and Square ($SQ), spoke out against the proposition ー much to Benioff's ire. The two tech elites exchanged arguments about the issue on social media in mid-October. "I want to help fix the homeless problem in SF and California. I don’t believe this (Prop C) is the best way to do it," [Dorsey wrote](https://twitter.com/jack/status/1050780155524857856) on the platform he co-founded. "I think that Benioff probably has his hand a little bit closer to the pulse of San Francisco and the people who live there than Jack Dorsey. I mean there is a real frustration, a real concern and a real compassion fatigue among San Francisco residents," Wilson said. Dorsey wasn't alone. Legislators, including Mayor London Breed ー who has vowed to address homelessness ー spoke out against the proposition, which Wilson said just reinforces big tech's influence on the city. "I think what it showed is that big tech still has a big sway over political power in San Francisco and that there's no coherent solution in city hall on how to solve the homeless problem ー and yet voters in approving it are demanding that something be done," he said. For now, the proposition hangs in legal limbo. It did not pass with a full two-thirds legislative majority, which leaves it open to legal challenges from opponents.

Share:
More In Politics
Lawmakers Send Biden Reminder of War Powers Act Amid Ukraine-Russia Conflict
A bipartisan group of 43 representatives joined forces in a letter to President Joe Biden to remind the executive branch that it must seek the approval of Congress before authorizing a war — whether or not its in Ukraine as Russia continues its invasion. Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore. 4th District) led the effort and joined Cheddar News Wrap to explain. "It's time for Congress to get back the authority, which is vested to us in the constitution, not in the executive branch," he said. "The president. once we're at war, we speak with one voice with the commander in chief. But before that, it's up to the American people and Congress whether or not we're going to become engaged in a war."
Biden Should Go After Russian Energy Production With Sanctions, Says Rep Malliotakis
President Joe Biden will be delivering his first State of the Union address on Tuesday night, and with so many issues from Ukraine to inflation, everyone will be focused on what he might say. Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y. 11th District) joined Cheddar News to discuss what she thinks the president should address. "I think what he hasn't done yet is go after the gas, the oil, the minerals, the mining industries, that is incredibly important," she said. "There's still some banks there that are not sanctioned. He needs to go after all the banks, but I also think that providing the equipment that Ukraine needs to continue to protect its capital and its country are incredibly important."
Why China Seems to Be Backing the Russian Invasion of Ukraine
As Russia’s attack on Ukraine continues, one of its few big allies remaining appears to be China. Gordon Chang, Asian affairs expert and author of "The Coming Collapse of China," joined Cheddar News to discuss what might be behind China's support for Putin's current strategy. “I think China is looking at what Putin did yesterday, which is to raise his nuclear forces on a higher alert level,” Chang stated, “If they see that Putin gets away with his nuclear threats, which he's been making over the last three or four days, then I'm sure that Beijing is going to ramp up its threats as well, and it could ramp them up against any number of different countries with which it perceives it has a problem with"
Load More