*By Alisha Haridasani* Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation on Friday indicted 12 Russian military intelligence officers for interfering with the 2016 presidential election. The defendants “used a variety of means to hack the email accounts of volunteers and employees of the U.S. presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, including the email account of the Clinton campaign manager” with the intent to “stage releases of the stolen documents to interfere” with the election, the [indictment](https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download) stated. All 12 defendants were identified as officers of GRU, an intelligence agency that functions within the Russian military, making this the first time Mueller’s probe has gone after the Kremlin. Previous indictments have been directed at Russian nationals and companies, as well as several former Trump campaign aides, including Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn. The Russian-orchestrated plan disclosed Friday stopped short of altering the vote count, said Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a news conference, reiterating a point that has been repeated by the agency and other intelligence committees multiple times during the drawn-out investigation. "But what this gets to is that this was a misinformation campaign," said Louis Nelson, breaking news reporter at Politico. "Whether minds were changed, whether they were able to sway public opinion, that's the thing that's hard ー maybe impossible ー to quantify." The news dropped just days ahead of Trump’s controversial one-on-one with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Finland, timing that's unusual for the typically nonpartisan agency. "The Justice Department generally, typically, tries very hard to avoid even the appearance of doing anything that might be seen as politically motivated," said Nelson. Mueller's "by-the-book" reputation also adds to the intrigue around the timing of the announcement. "Frankly, it was a bit unexpected for him to have come out today with indictments today against Russian military officials," said Nelson. "Certainly, it changes the context of that meeting in Helsinki." The indictments have prompted some Democrats to call for Trump to cancel the meeting. "There should be no one-on-one meeting between this president and Mr. Putin. There needs to be other Americans in the room," said [Sen. Mark Warner,](https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/mueller-rosenstein-russia-indictments/h_4f0157a3b47ba1bed6b19ce61e38869a) a Democrat from Virginia who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee. Hours before Rosenstein’s announcement, the president was asked whether he would press Putin about the election meddling. “I will absolutely bring that up,” said Trump, during a joint press conference with British Prime Minister Theresa May in the UK. “I don’t think you’ll have any, ‘Gee I did it, I did it, you got me.’ There won’t be a Perry Mason here.” For the full segment, [click here.](https://cheddar.com/videos/mueller-indicts-12-russian-military-officials-and-what-it-means-for-the-trump-putin-summit)

Share:
More In Politics
Why Democrats Losing Hispanic Voters
Chuck Rocha, host of 'Nuestro' podcast and opinion contributor at The New York Times, joins Cheddar News to discuss why Democrats are losing Hispanic voters.
Return-to-Office Mandates Might Be Hurting the Middle Class
More businesses are requiring workers to return to the office, but there is concern that many employees in the middle class, especially women and people of color, need remote work options for reasons including childcare and financial security. Joan Williams, director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California, joined Cheddar to discuss why office mandates could be detrimental to the middle class. She noted that while companies claim a return to offices would help foster more collaboration and efficiency, reports show that they are successfully able to do their jobs from home.
California Governor Explores Texas-Like Law to Ban Assault Weapons
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled to allow the controversial Texas abortion law to remain in effect, banning abortion at six weeks and allowing any private citizen to sue a person or doctor aiding or abetting someone seeking an abortion. Outraged at this decision, California Governor Gavin Newsom is working to draft a proposal in line with the law as it relates to guns. Shawn Hubler, California correspondent at the New York Times, joins Cheddar News to discuss.
Getting Into the Vaccine Mandate Debate as Google Implements Its Own
Even as tech giant Google implements a vaccination mandate, charging its employees to declare their vaccine status within a time frame or risk dismissal, the federal government is tangled up in the court system trying to impose one of its own. Cindy Cohn, the executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Harry Nelson, founder and managing partner of Nelson Hardiman LLP, joined Cheddar to debate the ethics, efficacy, and legality surrounding the issue. While Cohn noted that she thinks the federal mandate might be legally sound, her organization is also concerned with a separate question of privacy. "At EFF what we're most interested in is the digital surveillance that's going along with some of these attempts to try to track and confirm whether people are vaccinated or not," she said.
Load More