*By Bridgette Webb* Corporate boards are often much smaller than the companies they serve, but their importance shouldn't be underestimated, said Ăsa Regnér, UN Women's deputy executive director. "Boards influence people's lives, so it's really important who is on those boards," Regnér said Monday in an interview on Cheddar. That is perhaps why California just passed new legislation that requires public companies in the state to have at least one woman on their boards by the end of 2019. By 2021, a minimum of two women must sit on boards of five or more; three, when boards have more than six people. For Regnér, it's about corporate America leading by example. "I think these kinds of legislation are normally really good," she said. It's important "to ask people to actually shape up and do something about the injustice that we see." But the law didn't sail through without opposition. Many argued it's not the government's right to dictate a company's board, and others argued the law may prioritize gender over other critical kinds of diversity ー like race and ethnicity, for example. Regnér disagreed. "There is already a quota going on, but it is an informal quota which favors men with a certain background," she said. "I don't think there is a contradiction to other backgrounds, this is one step I don't think \[demographics\] should fight each other." For full interview [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/%20Fostering%20an%20Unstereotyped%20Culture).

Share:
More In Politics
GOP AGs Move Anti-Affirmative Action Fight to the Workplace
The court’s ruling applies to higher education institutions and other entities that receive federal funding and doesn’t directly change private employer obligations, but business leaders might pull back diversity, equity and inclusion programs to avoid lawsuits.
First Amendment Group Sues Texas Governor Over TikTok Ban
A First Amendment group sued Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others on Thursday over the state’s TikTok ban on official devices, arguing the prohibition – which extends to public universities – is unconstitutional and impedes academic freedom.
Load More