If Spotify is the distributor, SoundCloud is the entry gate. That’s how SoundCloud differentiates itself from its competition, according to CEO Kerry Trainor.
“We’re with artists from the very beginning of their journey,” he told Cheddar in an interview Wednesday.
Trainor pointed out that many of the artists who dominated the charts late last year started on SoundCloud up to six years ago.
“We’re with artists when they’re putting their first uploads into the world, generating their first fans...whereas most of the other services are really further on in artists’ journeys.”
On Wednesday, the music and podcast streaming platform launched its first-ever advertising campaign titled “First on SoundCloud,” spotlighting new, emerging artists.
The news came on the same day that rival streaming platform, Pandora, announced plans to buy AdsWizz -- an audio ad tech company -- to create “the largest digital audio advertising ecosystem.”
But the question of how to pay artists fairly for their music looms large for the entire streaming industry.
“We’re still in pretty early days,” said Trainor.
“The exciting thing about streaming is that we now have a clear model where a lot of revenue is returning to music. Not [too] many years ago, there was a question mark whether people would pay for access to music at all.”
Eventually, he said, the industry will find a way to fix the economics around this.
Matternet founder and CEO Andreas Raptopoulos on the state of drone delivery in the U.S. and what it will take to make aerial delivery a mainstream reality.
Fintech pioneer Tom Sosnoff discusses the evolution of retail investing, the rise of AI, and his new platform Lossdog aimed at the next generation of trading.
The FAA prepares to select cities for its eVTOL pilot program, marking a major step toward electric air taxis and the future of urban air mobility in the U.S.
Rising oil prices tied to the Iran conflict are driving up gas and airfare costs, creating new challenges for travelers heading into the spring break season.
The Supreme Court strikes down Trump-era tariffs, limiting presidential trade powers and raising questions about refunds, global trade, and business impact.
