*By Carlo Versano* Google cut its losses quickly this week after reports surfaced of a previously-unreported data issue at the struggling Google+ social network. The Alphabet-owned company ($GOOGL) said in a [blog post](https://www.blog.google/technology/safety-security/project-strobe/) on Monday that it would shutter Google+ to consumers as part of a larger restructuring of its privacy controls. It noted that "90 percent of Google+ user sessions are less than five seconds." The post seemed timed to respond to a [report](https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-exposed-user-data-feared-repercussions-of-disclosing-to-public-1539017194) in the Wall Street Journal that revealed the company had discovered a vulnerability back in March that left the private data of hundreds of thousands of Google+ users potentially exposed for as long as three years until the hole was found and patched. While Google has come under fire for plenty of things ー from the types of ads that have appeared on its YouTube platform to manipulation of its search algorithms ー this scandal now brings its data practices into question. One of the reporters who broke that story, Douglas MacMillan, told Cheddar Tuesday that Google is now facing questions ー both internally and from the public ー about its policy. The Journal reported that Google executives, including CEO Sundar Pichai, made a strategic decision to keep the vulnerability secret, given the potential for "immediate regulatory interest." MacMillan said that decision was hotly discussed inside Google, though the extent to which top-level employees disagreed with the final ruling is unknown. The bug was discovered just as the Facebook ($FB) scandal involving Cambridge Analytica was reinvigorating a public debate over how big tech companies handle the massive troves of data they collect. Google said the vulnerability was a result of a coding bug in conjunction with an API that gave access to outside developers and exposed the names, email addresses, occupations, genders, and ages of roughly 500,000 users. The company said it found no evidence that the exposed data was misused by third-party developers. That's still worrying for many users, many of whom would prefer to know when their information is potentially put at risk, MacMillan said. "Billions of people are trusting this company with some of the most sensitive data they have," he added. The decision to keep the issue private and then kill the social network altogether reflects the ever-heightened stakes for the handful of tech companies that control the vast majority of the web. The "growth at all costs" mantra is being replaced with a more cautious approach that seeks to weigh the trust of an increasingly skeptical public ー and new interest from regulators on Capitol Hill. But by not immediately alerting the public last spring, Google likely made the matter worse for itself. And now it must overcome a scandal just as it gets ready to [unveil](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIG1k8umaCIIrujZPzZPIMA) a slate of new devices. MacMillan cited his own sources inside Google who told him there is an "awakening" that the company may have some of the same issues as arch-rival Facebook. This is "not going to help" that perception, he said. Shares of Google parent Alphabet are down nearly 10 percent from their all-time highs in July. For full interview [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/searching-for-answers-after-google-gaffe).

Share:
More In Business
Rare Dom Pérignon champagne from Charles and Diana’s wedding fails to sell during Denmark auction
A rare magnum of Dom Pérignon Vintage 1961 champagne that was specially produced for the 1981 wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana has failed to sell during an auction. Danish auction house Bruun Rasmussen handled the bidding Thursday. The auction's house website lists the bottle as not sold. It was expected to fetch up to around $93,000. It is one of 12 bottles made to celebrate the royal wedding. Little was revealed about the seller. The auction house says the bids did not receive the desired minimum price.
New York Times, after Trump post, says it won’t be deterred from writing about his health
The New York Times and President Donald Trump are fighting again. The news outlet said Wednesday it won't be deterred by Trump's “false and inflammatory language” from writing about the 79-year-old president's health. The Times has done a handful of stories on that topic recently, including an opinion column that said Trump is “starting to give President Joe Biden vibes.” In a Truth Social post, Trump said it might be treasonous for outlets like the Times to do “FAKE” reports about his health and "we should do something about it.” The Republican president already has a pending lawsuit against the newspaper for its past reports on his finances.
OpenAI names Slack CEO Dresser as first chief of revenue
OpenAI has appointed Slack CEO Denise Dresser as its first chief of revenue. Dresser will oversee global revenue strategy and help businesses integrate AI into daily operations. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently emphasized improving ChatGPT, which now has over 800 million weekly users. Despite its success, OpenAI faces competition from companies like Google and concerns about profitability. The company earns money from premium ChatGPT subscriptions but hasn't ventured into advertising. Altman had recently announced delays in developing new products like AI agents and a personal assistant.
Trump approves sale of more advanced Nvidia computer chips used in AI to China
President Donald Trump says he will allow Nvidia to sell its H200 computer chip used in the development of artificial intelligence to “approved customers” in China. Trump said Monday on his social media site that he had informed China’s leader Xi Jinping and “President Xi responded positively!” There had been concerns about allowing advanced computer chips into China as it could help them to compete against the U.S. in building out AI capabilities. But there has also been a desire to develop the AI ecosystem with American companies such as chipmaker Nvidia.
Load More