*By Christian Smith* In 1991, Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY) was among the seven female Democratic congresswomen who convinced Senate Democrats to allow Anita Hill to testify about her sexual assault allegations against then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. And now, given Prof. Christine Blasey Ford's searing testimony on Thursday, Lowey thinks Brett Kavanaugh should not be confirmed to the Supreme Court. "You have to look at the whole person, and from what I hear from Dr. Ford, I would not want to see Judge Kavanaugh on the highest court of the land," she said. To Lowey, the Court is sacred ー and its justices should follow suit in their personal conduct, not just in their careers. "We know that an appointment to the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court of the United States of America, is more than intelligence and an Ivy League school. His credibility, and his character, has to be evaluated," she said. In a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday, Ford answered questions for over three hours about her claims that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when the two were in high school ー accusations that Lowey said seem credible. "She seemed, certainly to me, to present an honest, honest perspective," Lowey said. Her convictions about Ford aside, Lowey noted that the accusations against Kavanaugh should still be investigated thoroughly by the proper authorities. "We should take our time, and he should be subject to an FBI investigation," Rep. Lowey said. She acknowledged, though, that Kavanaugh should still get a confirmation vote. For full interview [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/congresswoman-nita-lowey-d-ny-calls-on-senate-to-allow-fbi-investigation-of-kavanaugh-accusers-claims).

Share:
More In Politics
Gun Control Hits Snag In Congress
Gun control is at the top of the agenda for many in Washington. A number of initiatives have been proposed, from raising the minimum purchasing age for guns to banning bump stocks. But with so many cooks in the kitchen, will anything get done?
Explaining the U.S. vs. Microsoft Case
The Supreme Court hears arguments Tuesday which center around an old law written in 1986, well before email and cloud storage were so prevalent. The case has big implications for consumer privacy, says Steven Overly, tech reporter at Politico.
The Supreme Court to Dreamers: "Dream On"
Gideon Resnick, political reporter for The Daily Beast, discusses the Supreme Court's decision to not hear the Trump administration's appeals argument on DACA. This move essentially eliminates the March 5th deadline instated by President Trump last year.
How the Midterm Elections are Shaking Out in Texas
The midterm elections are rapidly approaching. Members of Congress have those races in the backs of their heads as they make key policy decisions in Washington. J.D. Durkin brings us a special look at the race in Texas.
Closing Bell: February 26, 2018
The Dow closes up nearly 400 points. Apple is reportedly releasing three new phones. Samsung unveiled its new S9 and S9+. The Supreme Court declined to take up the Trump Administration's appeal on DACA. Fitbit misses on earnings.
Between Bells: February 23, 2018
Cheddar Politics goes in-depth on the gun debate with The Young Turks, Rare Media, and Congressman Ted Deutch (D-FL). Between Bells catches up with Glam Masters' Kandee Johnson, and UnREAL's Bart Edwards.
How The Media Treats White Shooters Vs. People Of Color
In the wake of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, many people quickly pointed to mental health as the issue at hand. The quick pivot from guns to mental health once again raises the question - how does the media treat white shooters versus people of color?
Agree To Disagree: Gun Control
In the wake of the Parkland shooting, President Trump and a number of Republicans have suggested raising the minimum age for buying a gun to 21. Will President Trump actually follow through? The Root's Michael Harriott and CRTV's Jon Miller discuss.
Load More