Coca-Cola Exec: Governments See "Soda Tax" as Easy Way to Bring in Revenue
The feud between the health conscious and the health liberal has long been a thorn in Coca-Cola’s side. One recent battlefront: lobbyists advocating for a sugar tax to be added on the sale of non-alcoholic beverages in the U.S. and abroad.
John Murphy, the company’s Asia Pacific Group president, told Cheddar that the issue affects his business, and he says doesn’t think the tax will have the desired effect.
“Many governments need revenue and they see our industry as being a very easy place to source it,” Murphy said. He points out that Coca-Cola has expanded its portfolio of healthier drinks with zero-calorie and low-calorie beverages, particularly in Japan.
Health groups have introduced soda taxes across the U.S. in hopes of reducing the consumption of sugary drinks, which contribute to obesity and other health problems. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 36.5 percent of adults in the U.S. are obese and that healthcare costs for the group are higher than for others.
Soda companies have fought against a lot of that regulation, though. A study published last year found that over a four-year span, Coca-Cola and rival PepsiCo took issue with 29 health bills aimed at soda consumption.
“These companies lobbied against public health intervention in 97 percent of cases, calling into question a sincere commitment to improving the public’s health,” the study concluded. “By accepting funding from these companies, health organizations are inadvertently participating in their marketing plans.”
The two drink giants sponsored 95 national obesity-focused health organizations, according to the same report.
Stephen Kates, Financial Analyst at Bankrate, joins to discuss the Fed’s 25-basis-point rate cut, inflation risks, and what it all means for consumers and marke
Big tech earnings take center stage as investors digest results from Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Apple, with insights from Gil Luria of D.A. Davidson
Disney content has gone dark on YouTube TV, leaving subscribers of the Google-owned live streaming platform without access to major networks like ESPN and ABC. That’s because the companies have failed to reach a new licensing deal to keep Disney channels on YouTube TV. Depending on how long it lasts, the dispute could particularly impact coverage of U.S. college football matchups over the weekend — on top of other news and entertainment disruptions that have already arrived. In the meantime, YouTube TV subscribers who want to watch Disney channels could have little choice other than turning to the company’s own platforms, which come with their own price tags.
President Donald Trump said he has decided to lower his combined tariff rates on imports of Chinese goods to 47% after talks with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on curbing fentanyl trafficking.
Universal Music Group and AI platform Udio have settled a copyright lawsuit and will collaborate on a new music creation and streaming platform. The companies announced on Wednesday that they reached a compensatory legal settlement and new licensing agreements. These agreements aim to provide more revenue opportunities for Universal's artists and songwriters. The rise of AI song generation tools like Udio has disrupted the music streaming industry, leading to accusations from record labels. This deal marks the first since Universal and others sued Udio and Suno last year. Financial terms of the settlement weren't disclosed.
