*By Hope King and Jacqueline Corba* The Trump administration is [reportedly](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-10/u-s-is-said-poised-to-publish-200-billion-china-tariff-list) poised to identify another $200 billion worth of Chinese goods that could be hit with tariffs, ramping up the trade war yet again and putting technology in focus in the trade war between the world’s two largest economies. And telecom equipment maker Huawei, the global market leader in the industry, is caught in the middle. But the company's U.S. Chief Security Officer Andy Purdy disputes the heart of President Donald Trump's thesis for the import taxes ー that Chinese companies present a threat to national security. "The geopolitics involved in tariffs is only minimally related to the question of intellectual property," Purdy told Cheddar in an interview this week. He said Huawei is one of the largest obtainers of patents and that the company "pays millions" per year to use other company's intellectual property "lawfully." The trade war between the U.S. and China began July 6 when the U.S. added 25 percent tax on imports on $34 billion worth of Chinese goods, including lithium batteries, electrical resistors, and circuit breakers ー all of which are used in Huawei products. With [28 percent share of the worldwide telecom equipment market](http://www.telecomlead.com/telecom-statistics/ericsson-closes-the-gap-in-mobile-infrastructure-market-share-with-huawei-82888) and as the third largest smartphone maker in the world, Huawei's supply chain is massive. Purdy, however, maintains the company's business will not be impacted. “We don’t foresee any negative impact on our ability to obtain the components that we include in our products,” he said. Huawei is no stranger to scrutiny by the United States. The company, along with ZTE, has been held up as an example of the economic and national security threat to the U.S. In 2012, the House Intelligence Committee [wrote](https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/huawei-zte%20investigative%20report%20(final).pdf): > "The companies failed to provide evidence that would satisfy any fair and full investigation. Although this alone does not prove wrongdoing, it factors into the Committee’s conclusions below. Further, this report contains a classified annex, which also adds to the Committee’s concerns about the risk to the United States. The investigation concludes that the risks associated with Huawei’s and ZTE’s provision of equipment to U.S. critical infrastructure could undermine core U.S. national-security interests.” Purdy pushed back. “There have never been any examples of instances where Huawei has implanted backdoors or done improper conduct. There is no indication we’ve done any improper things on behalf of the Chinese government,” he told Cheddar. “The statement that we did not fully cooperate is really unfair. We fully cooperated, we explained the fact that we are an employee-owned company through and through. There are a number of companies that are partially owned by the Chinese government. We are not one of them." On top of these past accusations Huawei now also faces a new proposed measure by the Federal Communications Commission which would restrict the company from selling its equipment in the United States. Purdy says doing so would hurt American businesses. "There is going to be a tremendous negative impact on those carriers who provide the last miles of wireless connectivity," he said. "It's going to cost hundreds of millions of dollars of those tier-three wireless providers, if they are forced to rip out Huawei products or have to cut back on their services because of the FCC action. We believe there is a very strong case that Huawei is meeting the needs of these companies for the U.S. at no risk." For the full segment, [click here.](https://cheddar.com/videos/huawei-u-s-chief-security-officer-addresses-fallout-from-u-s-china-trade-war)

Share:
More In Business
Starbucks’ Change Flushes Out a Debate Over Public Restroom Access
Starbucks’ decision to restrict its restrooms to paying customers has flushed out a wider problem: a patchwork of restroom use policies that varies by state and city. Starbucks announced last week a new code of conduct that says people need to make a purchase if they want to hang out or use the restroom. The coffee chain's policy change for bathroom privileges has left Americans confused and divided over who gets to go and when. The American Restroom Association, a public toilet advocacy group, was among the critics. Rules about restroom access in restaurants vary by state, city and county. The National Retail Federation says private businesses have a right to limit restroom use.
Trump Highlights Partnership Investing $500 Billion in AI
President Donald Trump is talking up a joint venture investing up to $500 billion for infrastructure tied to artificial intelligence by a new partnership formed by OpenAI, Oracle and SoftBank. The new entity, Stargate, will start building out data centers and the electricity generation needed for the further development of the fast-evolving AI in Texas, according to the White House. The initial investment is expected to be $100 billion and could reach five times that sum. While Trump has seized on similar announcements to show that his presidency is boosting the economy, there were already expectations of a massive buildout of data centers and electricity plants needed for the development of AI.
Load More