It is hard to go an entire day without scrolling through social media, checking in on family members and friends, and double-tapping on their posts. 

That may explain why attitudes toward social media giants like Facebook and Twitter are mixed among Americans ahead of the 2020 election. 

A new Cheddar poll found more than 40 percent of Americans believe that Facebook (45 percent) and Twitter (44 percent) are treating political content the same when it comes to flagging and deleting certain posts, regardless of ideology. But one in five still think the platforms unfairly target conservative content — that number jumps to nearly 40 percent among Republicans. 

More than half of Democrats and nearly half of Independents believe these companies treat political speech the same. 

This reveals some of the clearest fractures among different voter groups when it comes to attitudes toward social media platforms and the content that they host. 

About a third of Americans believe that Facebook and Twitter should remove posts believed to be false but around half of Americans (Facebook: 55 percent, Twitter 47 percent) believe those posts should stay up — though more than half of those people say the content should include a disclaimer. 

This poll collected responses after social media platforms removed a controversial article published by the New York Post regarding a laptop with compromising information that purportedly belonged to Hunter Biden, leading to outrage among conservative groups who likened it to a violation of the First Amendment. It led to allegations that social media companies remove speech they dislike rather than removing speech that violates their terms of service. Now lawmakers are pushing for testimony from those companies’ CEOs about the censorship of conservative content and calling for more regulation of the platforms. 

Section 230 has become a buzzword on Capitol Hill around social media regulation. The obscure part of the Communications Decency Act gives social media companies wide liability protection over content posted on their sites. 

But regardless of how often lawmakers rail against Section 230 protections, it does not seem to have the same impact when it comes to American sentiment. Slightly more Americans believe the government should regulate technology platforms versus allowing them to regulate themselves, 40 percent to 37 percent respectively. 

This comes as those lawmakers argue about the legal loopholes that allow social media giants to profit off of content on their platforms but are not held accountable for that content. Many conservative legislators in particular are concerned about the regulation of conservative speech, despite conservative content routinely making up the top posts on Facebook each week. 

This also tracks with the trend among self-described conservatives who largely believe that conservative-leaning content is more censored than any other content. 

It’s a message that has been reinforced by the White House, where President Donald Trump has held official presidential events to combat perceived social media bias, filling the Rose Garden with popular right-leaning online personalities and launching a tool in 2019 encouraging people to report incidents of social media bias. That portal is now closed, but that messaging may explain why the president holds a slight lead on the topic of which candidate is best equipped to handle powerful social media companies. Overall, 42 percent of people said Trump will best respond to a world where social media companies hold a lot of power, compared to 38 percent for former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic presidential nominee. 

Americans under 35 and older than 65 see Biden as slightly better to manage social media power than Trump, while people in the middle age ranges give the edge to Trump. Men rank Trump as better to handle social media giants, while women say it would be Biden. 

It’s clear, though, that no matter who is elected president on Election Day, social media companies will face a great deal of scrutiny in the future. This week, the Department of Justice filed antitrust charges against technology giant Google and many lawmakers have suggested the same must be done for Facebook and other social media platforms. 

Social media CEOs will continue to be questioned by lawmakers on their influence on the American electorate, but if it’s difficult to chart a legislative path forward, it may be due to divisions among the American people when it comes to attitudes toward social media and the regulation of these companies. 

This poll of 2,000 adults was conducted between October 16 and October 19 exclusively for Cheddar by SurveyUSA.

Share:
More In Politics
Biden Speaks With EU Leaders Amid Growing Tensions With Russia
As the standoff between the U.S. and its allies continues with Russia over its possible designs to invade Ukraine, President Biden held a video conference call with European leadership and had 8,500 American troops put on high alert. Jamil Jaffer, a former associate White House counsel for the Bush Administration, joined Cheddar to discuss his views on the escalating crisis in Eastern Europe.
Supreme Court Again Declines to Block Texas Abortion Law
The Supreme Court has rejected another request to block Texas' strict abortion law. This marks the third time the high court has declined to intervene in challenges to the law that bans abortions after six weeks, well before many women even know they're pregnant. Aziza Ahmed, professor of law at the University of California, Irvine, joined Cheddar News to discuss the impact of the law so far on women seeking abortion services in Texas.
U.S. Mayors Consider Crypto to Fix Economic Inequality
Mayors in cities like Miami and New York City are considering introducing cryptocurrencies as a way to reduce economic inequality. Miami Mayor Francis X. Suarez has even pushed for distributing Bitcoin dividends to the city's inhabitants.
Vaccination Mandate for Crossing U.S. Border to Go Into Effect
The U.S. will be implementing a vaccine mandate for all people entering through its land borders, removing exemptions for "essential" travelers such as truckers, students, and business people. While the Canadian Trucking Alliance argues that the new, stricter rule might exacerbate ongoing auto supply chain issues, some health experts see the potential for helping curb the ongoing pandemic. Anthony Santella, a professor of health administration at the University of New Haven, joined Cheddar to give his take on the updated border crossing restriction. "We can't just focus on one type of travel. We need to ensure that it's clear and consistent across all types of travel," Santella said.
Jan. 6 Committee Asks Ivanka Trump to Give Voluntary Testimony
The January 6 committee has asked Ivanka Trump to give voluntary testimony, saying there's evidence she was in "direct contact" with her father on the day of the capitol insurrection. I's unclear whether she will comply with the invitation, but it marks the first time the House committee has sought testimony from a member of the former president's family. Bradley Moss, national security attorney, joined Cheddar News to discuss what the committee hopes to learn from Ivanka and what the Supreme Court's decision on Trump's Jan. 6 materials means for the investigation.
Load More