AT&T won approval Tuesday of its $85 billion bid for Time Warner, a decision that could pave the way for more mega-deals in the media industry. A U.S. judge ruled the Justice Department did not sufficiently show that a tie-up would stifle competition or harm consumers. He also tried to dissuade the government from appealing his decision. The merger of the two companies, announced in October 2016, was closely watched by other media and telecom companies with ambitions to cross over. Internet providers and cable distributors are looking for new revenue sources to compete with streaming content companies such as Netflix and Amazon. But the government has been skeptical of the consolidation of content and delivery. The Justice Department sued to block AT&T's deal last November, citing concerns over the telecom company owning both DirecTV and Time Warner. Tuesday's ruling in favor of AT&T could preclude similar arguments to block mergers down the road. The cable TV giant Comcast said earlier this week it would submit an all-cash bid as early as Wednesday to buy assets from 21st Century Fox if the AT&T acquisition was approved. Comcast's bid for Fox could upend Disney's offer, and send that company looking for another target. Shares of Comcast, Disney, and AT&T were all down after the judge's ruling. Fox and Time Warner stock were rising. An AT&T spokesman said the company is "gratified" by the decision. The deal is expected to close by June 20.

Share:
More In Business
Dimon: Bank rules should change after Silicon Valley Bank
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said the U.S. and the banking industry should amend regulations following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank last month, saying that the financial system needs to be adjusted so that one bank's failure does not “cause undue panic and financial harm.”
Disney-DeSantis War of Words Heats Up at Annual Meeting
Disney CEO Bob Iger on Monday said any retaliatory actions by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature against the company that threaten jobs or expansion at its Florida resort is not only “anti-business ... but anti-Florida.”
Load More