*By Carlo Versano* When freshman Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez floated the idea to Anderson Cooper on "60 Minutes" Sunday that the very wealthy pay a marginal tax rate as high as 70 percent, it got pundits and politicians all worked up. What exactly was the newly-elected, self-proclaimed radical proposing? But as it turns out, a higher marginal tax rate is not particularly radical in the context of American history. Marginal tax rates, in which taxes increase as income rises, were as high as 90 percent under President Eisenhower, and were above 50 percent up until the second Reagan tax cut. But according to Kyle Pomerleau, an economist at the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan, business-friendly think tank, higher marginal rates do not bring in the promised revenue, and instead are an example of "the worst of both worlds." Ocasio-Cortez's policy would "distort behavior" as individuals in the highest brackets would find ways to skirt the system. One of the ways they would do that, Pomerleau said, would be to stop selling assets defined as capital gains, which make up the majority of the taxable income at the top of the ladder and are only taxed when they're sold. "The amount of taxable realizations will plummet," Pomerleau said. The safety net programs that progressives like Ocasio-Cortez seek to strengthen, like Medicare and Social Security, are better funded through other forms of taxation, Pomerleau said, such as a payroll tax, or the European model of sales, payroll, and value-added taxes. But the bottom line, he said, is that "everyone is going to have to pay higher taxes." That is not a foregone conclusion. Those who advocate for very high marginal tax rates on the wealthy include some respected economists, including Nobel Prize-winner Peter Diamond. Diamond has estimated the top tax rate should be [73 percent](https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.25.4.165), while a pair of Berkeley economists have put it as high as [80 percent](http://ceg.berkeley.edu/research_117_2123314150.pdf). Or as Paul Krugman [put it](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/05/opinion/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-tax-policy-dance.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage) on Monday: "The optimal tax rate on people with very high incomes is the rate that raises the maximum possible revenue." At the very least, Ocasio-Cortez's ideas about the marginal tax rate, given that she has such an outsized megaphone within the Democratic Party at the moment, signals that Democrats are getting "more serious" about progressive income taxation, Pomerleau said. And both sides can agree that the individual tax code is in need of simplification, he said. "There's still a lot of work to be done to fix that." For full interview [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/ocasio-cortez-calls-for-radical-income-tax-reform).

Share:
More In Politics
U.S. Back to Negotiating Iran Nuclear Deal After Trump Withdrew in 2018
The U.S. is back in negotiations for a nuclear deal with Iran, years after former President Donald Trump withdrew the country from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which had been meant to curtail the Middle Eastern nation's nuclear ambitions. Former State Department senior advisor to the George W. Bush and Trump administrations, Christian Whiton, joined Cheddar News Wrap to discuss. “It appears to be very similar to the original JCPOA, which does put some constraints on Iran's nuclear program, but also has sunset provisions, including some that in the original plan were expected to take effect in 2025," he said. "And so, if we just reenter that plan, really it just buys perhaps a few years of slowing down, stopping, whatever you want to say, Iran's nuclear program."
Russia Orders Troops Into Two Ukrainian Regions, White House Calls the Conflict an Invasion
The U.S. has announced the first of what could be multiple levels of sanctions against Russia after Moscow recognized two regions of Ukraine as independent. This comes as Britain imposes sanctions on five Russian banks and two oligarchs, and Germany freezes the Nord Stream gas pipeline. Terrell Star, a foreign affairs reporter at The Atlantic Council, joins from Kyiv to discuss.
Price at the Pump Expected to Rise as Fear of Russian Invasion of Ukraine Grows
Growing tensions in Ukraine might soon be impacting consumers in the United States. With Russia on an invasion footing in the region, gas prices are predicted to go up 10 to 15 cents a gallon in the next coming weeks, according to Robert Sinclair, spokesperson for AAA. Sinclair joined Cheddar to break down what could happen even further. "We've been seeing prices go up, and there's been nothing that's happened to affect supplies," he said. "But it's something known as the fear tax where just the talk of something that might interfere with supplies leads to prices going up speculatively."
End of 3G Networks Expected to Impact Millions of Car Owners
The end of 3G is upon us. On Tuesday, AT&T became the first major provider to disable its 3G services, and T-Mobile and Verizon plan to follow suit later this year. The shutdowns are expected to impact millions of vehicles that use 3G networks for updates, remote connection, and certain emergency and convenience features. Lance Ulanoff, the U.S. Editor-in-Chief of TechRadar, joined Cheddar's Closing Bell to discuss the ramifications of the changeover.
Biden Imposes Economic Sanctions On Russia
President Biden unveiled new economic sanctions on Russia for what he called "the beginning of a Russian invasion". This came one day after Putin sent troops into two breakaway regions of eastern Ukraine. Alex Ward, national security reporter for POLITICO, explains what these sanctions might do to the global economy.
Stocks Close Sharply Lower Amid Russia-Ukraine Tensions
U.S. stocks ended today's session sharply lower on the heels of rising geopolitical tensions between Russia and Ukraine. Melissa Brown, Managing Director of Applied Research at Qontigo, joins Cheddar News' Closing Bell to discuss.
U.S. Will Impose Sanctions on Russia After Troops Entered Ukraine for Alleged Peacekeeping
President Joe Biden said Tuesday that the U.S. will begin to impose sanctions on Russia, calling recent troop movement into Ukraine an 'invasion.' Biden and other government officials including from the State Department have begun to classify the Russian troop movement as an invasion after Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to two independent Ukrainian areas in an alleged "peacekeeping" mission — which the West considers an act of aggression. Biden said Russia will continue to pay 'an even steeper price' if it continues sending troops into Ukraine. What happens next? Will Putin find a way around these sanctions? Ariel Cohen, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, joins Closing Bell to discuss Biden's remarks, how the West will protect Ukraine since it doesn't belong to NATO, and more.
Load More