*By Carlo Versano* When freshman Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez floated the idea to Anderson Cooper on "60 Minutes" Sunday that the very wealthy pay a marginal tax rate as high as 70 percent, it got pundits and politicians all worked up. What exactly was the newly-elected, self-proclaimed radical proposing? But as it turns out, a higher marginal tax rate is not particularly radical in the context of American history. Marginal tax rates, in which taxes increase as income rises, were as high as 90 percent under President Eisenhower, and were above 50 percent up until the second Reagan tax cut. But according to Kyle Pomerleau, an economist at the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan, business-friendly think tank, higher marginal rates do not bring in the promised revenue, and instead are an example of "the worst of both worlds." Ocasio-Cortez's policy would "distort behavior" as individuals in the highest brackets would find ways to skirt the system. One of the ways they would do that, Pomerleau said, would be to stop selling assets defined as capital gains, which make up the majority of the taxable income at the top of the ladder and are only taxed when they're sold. "The amount of taxable realizations will plummet," Pomerleau said. The safety net programs that progressives like Ocasio-Cortez seek to strengthen, like Medicare and Social Security, are better funded through other forms of taxation, Pomerleau said, such as a payroll tax, or the European model of sales, payroll, and value-added taxes. But the bottom line, he said, is that "everyone is going to have to pay higher taxes." That is not a foregone conclusion. Those who advocate for very high marginal tax rates on the wealthy include some respected economists, including Nobel Prize-winner Peter Diamond. Diamond has estimated the top tax rate should be [73 percent](https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.25.4.165), while a pair of Berkeley economists have put it as high as [80 percent](http://ceg.berkeley.edu/research_117_2123314150.pdf). Or as Paul Krugman [put it](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/05/opinion/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-tax-policy-dance.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage) on Monday: "The optimal tax rate on people with very high incomes is the rate that raises the maximum possible revenue." At the very least, Ocasio-Cortez's ideas about the marginal tax rate, given that she has such an outsized megaphone within the Democratic Party at the moment, signals that Democrats are getting "more serious" about progressive income taxation, Pomerleau said. And both sides can agree that the individual tax code is in need of simplification, he said. "There's still a lot of work to be done to fix that." For full interview [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/ocasio-cortez-calls-for-radical-income-tax-reform).

Share:
More In Politics
Biden Choice to Keep Jerome Powell at Fed Was 'Path of Least Resistance'
President Joe Biden named Jerome Powell, initially appointed by President Trump, to keep his seat as the chair of the Federal Reserve on Monday amid the ongoing challenges of the pandemic, inflation, and unemployment. David Beckworth, a former international economist for the Treasury Department and a senior fellow with the Mercatus Center, joined Cheddar to discuss what he sees as the practicality of Biden's decision. "What Powell brings to the table is he's built up political capital with Republicans and Democrats," he said. "It's easy for him to get the job done. I think in one way he was the path of least resistance for the president."
Elizabeth Holmes to Resume Theranos Testimony
In a surprise turn of events, Elizabeth Holmes took the stand in her own defense on Friday and is expected to continue her testimony later today. Holmes, who founded a blood testing start-up Theranos back in 2003, faces 11 counts of wire fraud as well as conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Aron Solomon, Chief Legal Analyst, Esquire Digital joined Cheddar's Opening Bell to discuss.
House Passes Build Back Better Plan, Goes to Senate
The House narrowly passed President Biden's $1.7 trillion Build Back Better bill, the largest expansion of the social safety net in decades. The final vote was 220 to 213, with only one Democrat joining all Republicans in opposing the bill. It now heads to the Senate, where it faces an uncertain fate. Jennifer Haberkorn, congressional reporter for the Los Angeles Times, joins Cheddar News' Closing Bell, where she breaks down the current version of the bill, where it goes next, and what it could mean for the country if it eventually reaches the president's desk.
Rittenhouse, Mcmichaels Trials Felt Across The Country
Two murder trials in focus in America — Wisconsin V. Kyle Rittenhouse and Georgia V. Travis Mcmichael, Gregory Mcmichael, and William Bryan, the Men who killed Ahmaud Arbery. Civil rights and criminal defense lawyer Anthony Tall and the Founder and CEO of Kim Crowder consulting Kim Crowder, joined Cheddar to discuss more.
Load More