California voters have decided gig economy workers should be classified as contractors, not employees. 

Proposition 22 centered around whether app companies like Uber and Lyft could continue to classify their workers as independent contractors. It has become the most expensive ballot measure in history, with $224.3 million spent on campaigning on both sides of the debate per the Los Angeles Times. About $204 million came from companies supporting the “yes” vote, including Uber, DoorDash, Lyft, Postmates and Instacart, which utilized commercials and direct marketing campaigns including pop-up notifications on their apps.

The initiative was tied to California’s Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which required companies to classify more workers as employees. As employees, companies would be required to provide additional benefits for their workers including unemployment insurance, paid time off, overtime pay and health insurance. 

Gig economy apps argued hiring all their workers as employees would cut into their revenue, driving concerns that it may lead the apps to accept fewer workers after AB5 led to many media companies laying off freelancer writers in 2019 because they could not afford to bring them on as employees. About 20 percent of total employee costs come from providing standard benefits, according to California Legislative Analyst’s Office. 

Uber and Lyft also argued AB5 might also prevent workers from choosing their own hours. Gig economy workers, however, did win certain benefits. Proposition 22 will require apps to pay an hourly wage equal to 120 percent of the area’s minimum wage, although they will not have to pay for time spent waiting for requests. The companies will also be required to pay for some of their workers’ health benefits as long as they work at least 15 hours for the app.  

Updated November 4, 2020 at 12:45 pm ET to correct headline. Voters voted "yes'"on Prop. 22. They did not vote it "down" as previously stated.

Share:
More In Business
Disney content has gone dark on YouTube TV: What you need to know
Disney content has gone dark on YouTube TV, leaving subscribers of the Google-owned live streaming platform without access to major networks like ESPN and ABC. That’s because the companies have failed to reach a new licensing deal to keep Disney channels on YouTube TV. Depending on how long it lasts, the dispute could particularly impact coverage of U.S. college football matchups over the weekend — on top of other news and entertainment disruptions that have already arrived. In the meantime, YouTube TV subscribers who want to watch Disney channels could have little choice other than turning to the company’s own platforms, which come with their own price tags.
Universal Music and AI song generator Udio partner on new AI platform
Universal Music Group and AI platform Udio have settled a copyright lawsuit and will collaborate on a new music creation and streaming platform. The companies announced on Wednesday that they reached a compensatory legal settlement and new licensing agreements. These agreements aim to provide more revenue opportunities for Universal's artists and songwriters. The rise of AI song generation tools like Udio has disrupted the music streaming industry, leading to accusations from record labels. This deal marks the first since Universal and others sued Udio and Suno last year. Financial terms of the settlement weren't disclosed.
Load More