If one amateur mathematician had his way, we might not be celebrating Pi Day on March 14th. Way back in 1897, Edward Goodwin almost convinced the Indiana state legislature to pass the [Indiana Pi Bill](https://www.agecon.purdue.edu/crd/localgov/second%20level%20pages/indiana_pi_bill.htm), which would have legally defined the value of Ļ€ as 3.2. As Curiosity.com editor and podcast host Ashley Hamer tells it, Goodwin thought that he had solved a long standing mathematical problem. ā€œ[Mathematicians] were trying to come up with a square that had the same area as a circle, but because you have Pi in the formula for the area of a circle, you can’t actually do that,ā€ she said. ā€œIt would mean that one of the sides would have an irrational number.ā€ Convinced he had the answer, Goodwin helped introduce legislation that eventually passed the Indiana House with a 67-0 vote. But the bill was stopped when it got to the State Senate. ā€œThe Senate realized that you can’t actually make laws defining mathematical truths,ā€ Hamer told Cheddar. ā€œIt’d be sort of like making a law saying the Earth is flat. There’s no real reason to even make that law, because that’s not really their responsibility.ā€ For the full interview, [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/everything-youll-ever-need-to-know-about-pi-2).

Share:
More In Science
Climate Change May Force More Farmers and Ranchers to Consider Irrigation -- at a Steep Cost
Irrigation might have saved Jackson's hay, but she and her husband rejected the idea about 10 years ago over the cost: as much as $75,000 for a new well and all the equipment. But now — with an extended drought and another U.S. heat wave this week that will broil her land about an hour northwest of Dallas for days in 100-degree-plus temperatures — Jackson said she is ā€œkind of rethinking.ā€
Load More