Why South Dakota v. Wayfair Could Hit Mom-and-Pop Stores
*By Michael Teich*
A landmark e-commerce case being decided by the Supreme Court could have a big impact on mom-and-pop retailers trying to compete with the likes of Amazon, Overstock, and Wayfair.
The nation's highest court is expected to rule in the coming days on whether states can collect sales taxes on residents' online purchases. And a decision in favor of states could put smaller shops at a disadvantage if they too are forced to pay up, said Melissa Armo, owner of The Stock Swoosh.
“It's hard for any small business to compete with these stores,” she said in an interview with Cheddar.
Currently, the law states that retailers are not required to collect sales taxes from consumers unless they have a brick-and-mortar store in the state where that shopper resides. Those rules stem from a 1992 case applying to mail-order retailers. In the current case, *South Dakota v. Wayfair*, the state, along with several others, argues those rules are outdated.
But critics say changing the rules would have broader ramifications, with retailers being forced to comply with thousands of state and local tax authorities at what could be a significant cost.
And Armo questions who ultimately will reap the rewards.
“It’s to benefit the state," she said. "It’s not to benefit the consumer.”
For the full interview, [click here](https://cheddar.com/videos/how-internet-taxes-impact-online-retailers-and-consumers).
Merriam-Webster has fully revised its popular “Collegiate” dictionary with over 5,000 new words. They include “petrichor,” “dumbphone” and “ghost kitchen.” Also “cold brew,” “rizz,” “dad bod,” “hard pass,” “cancel culture” and more.
YouTube will offer creators a way to rejoin the streaming platform if they were banned for violating COVID-19 and election misinformation policies that are no longer in effect.
Lukas Alpert of MarketWatch explores how networks, brands, and ad buyers absorb the shockwaves when late‑night show hosts are suddenly cut — and brought back.
A new poll finds U.S. adults are more likely than they were a year ago to think immigrants in the country legally benefit the economy. That comes as President Donald Trump's administration imposes new restrictions targeting legal pathways into the country. The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research survey finds Americans are more likely than they were in March 2024 to say it’s a “major benefit” that people who come to the U.S. legally contribute to the economy and help American companies get the expertise of skilled workers. At the same time, perceptions of illegal immigration haven’t shifted meaningfully. Americans still see fewer benefits from people who come to the U.S. illegally.
