Once seen by politicians as a tool to tackle issues, Capitol Hill is finding out that technology could be a double-edged sword with unintended consequences. Cecilia Kang, National Technology Correspondent at The New York Times, joined to take a closer look at the crossroads between politics and Silicon Valley.
Kang discussed why the Democrats became sour on Silicon Valley. She said the 2016 election was the start of a journey for the Democratic party to evaluate the role of technology companies in the spread of information. Kang added that they wanted to investigate whether social media companies were good or potentially harmful for democracy. When the shock wore off from the election results, they wanted to look into what was behind the outcome.
Are Democrats just trying to find something else to blame for election results they aren’t happy with? Kang pointed out that social media companies themselves have acknowledged that they did play a role in the election. This is evident in the newsfeed algorithm changes implemented by Facebook. The company is now placing a heavier emphasis on content from friends and family opposed to content from publishers.
TIME Editorial Director Lucy Feldman breaks down the 2026 TIME100 Creators list, the evolution of the creator economy, and what's next for digital media.
Can blockbuster movies and streaming thrive together? Paul Dergarabedian breaks down The Odyssey's record box office, Netflix's earnings, and Hollywood's future
BMO Wealth Management's Carol Schleif breaks down inflation, Fed policy, earnings, AI investment, and where investors may find opportunities in today's market.
Fast Company's Christopher Zara breaks down the OpenAI-Apple legal battle, the AI chip race, and what's next for the future of artificial intelligence.
Glacier CEO Rebecca Hu-Thrams explains how AI-powered robots are making recycling smarter, reducing landfill waste, and transforming the future of waste.
